www-ws-desc@w3.org from June 2004 by date

Thursday, 1 July 2004

• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Hao.He@thomson.com
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Mark Baker

Wednesday, 30 June 2004

• Re: Issue 168 (Which Operation?) / Requirement R114 Umit Yalcinalp
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. David Orchard
• Agenda, 1 July 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Action item: HTTP binding for accepts header and output Serialization. Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Issue 168 (Which Operation?) / Requirement R114 David Booth
• RE: updated draft to put F&P in more places Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Issue 177: XML 1.1 support Jonathan Marsh
• Issue 197 action: proposed text Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Hugo Haas
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Mark Baker

Tuesday, 29 June 2004

• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Mark Nottingham
• Namespacing component properties Mark Nottingham
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. David Orchard
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Amelia A Lewis
• Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. David Orchard
• Revised Asynch Binding David Orchard
• RE: Application Data Feature and related stuff Glen Daniels
• RE: Application Data Feature and related stuff Glen Daniels
• RE: Application Data Feature and related stuff paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Application Data Feature and related stuff paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Application Data Feature and related stuff Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Application Data Feature and related stuff Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: Application Data Feature and related stuff Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: Application Data Feature and related stuff paul.downey@bt.com

Monday, 28 June 2004

• Re: Issue 177: XML 1.1 support Umit Yalcinalp
• RE: Application Data Feature and related stuff David Orchard
• Re: Issue 218 - Justify Interface Faults Mark Nottingham
• Re: updated draft to put F&P in more places Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: updated draft to put F&P in more places Roberto Chinnici
• Re: Issue 218 - Justify Interface Faults Hugo Haas
• Re: updated draft to put F&P in more places Hugo Haas

Sunday, 27 June 2004

• RE: Application Data Feature and related stuff Glen Daniels

Friday, 25 June 2004

• Re: Issue 214: Refine "properties" terminology Mark Nottingham
• RE: Minutes, 24 June 2004 WS Desc telcon paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Minutes, 24 June 2004 WS Desc telcon Sanjiva Weerawarana
• updated draft to put F&P in more places Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed David Orchard
• Re: Action item: HTTP binding for accepts header and output Serialization. Hugo Haas
• Re: expectedMediaType and Accept header syntax (was Re: Action it em: HTTP binding for accepts header and output Serialization.) Hugo Haas
• RE: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed paul.downey@bt.com
• WS-Description WG's LC comments on XMLP specs Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed Jeff Mischkinsky
• Re: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed Jeff Mischkinsky
• Issue 177: XML 1.1 support Jonathan Marsh

Thursday, 24 June 2004

• Minutes, 24 June 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Re: expectedMediaType and Accept header syntax (was Re: Action it em: HTTP binding for accepts header and output Serialization.) Umit Yalcinalp
• Re: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed Umit Yalcinalp
• Re: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Application Data Feature and related stuff paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Application Data Feature and related stuff Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: Issue 169: Syntax for webMethod - property or attribute? Mark Baker
• RE: expectedMediaType and Accept header syntax (was Re: Action it em: HTTP binding for accepts header and output Serialization.) Asir Vedamuthu
• expectedMediaType and Accept header syntax (was Re: Action item: HTTP binding for accepts header and output Serialization.) Hugo Haas
• Type of expectedMediaType element ?? Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: Action item: HTTP binding for accepts header and output Serialization. David Orchard
• Part 3: Relating serializations to operation styles Hugo Haas
• RE: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed David Orchard
• Re: Action item: HTTP binding for accepts header and output Serialization. Hugo Haas
• RE: Issue 169: Syntax for webMethod - property or attribute? David Orchard
• Re: Issue 169: Syntax for webMethod - property or attribute? Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Action item: HTTP binding for accepts header and output Serialization. David Orchard

Wednesday, 23 June 2004

• [final] Agenda, 24 June 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Issue 214: Refine "properties" terminology Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Issue 214: Refine "properties" terminology David Orchard
• Issue 214: Refine "properties" terminology Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Issue 157: Formalize processing model David Booth
• RE: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed Ugo Corda
• Issue 169: Syntax for webMethod - property or attribute? Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed Tom Jordahl
• Re: [Draft] Agenda, 24 June 2004 WS Desc telcon Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Issue 157: Formalize processing model Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Issue 160 [was 157]: Formalize processing model Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed Jonathan Marsh
• Application Data Feature and related stuff Glen Daniels
• Re: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Issue 210: component equivalence Tom Jordahl
• RE: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed Tom Jordahl
• Re: Issue 212: binding defaulting clarification Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Issue 210: component equivalence Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Issue 218 - Justify Interface Faults paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Issue 212: binding defaulting clarification Tom Jordahl
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and s howing messages Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: Issue 210: component equivalence Tom Jordahl
• Re: Issue 157: Formalize processing model Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Issue 157: Formalize processing model Sanjiva Weerawarana

Tuesday, 22 June 2004

• Re: Issue 157: Formalize processing model David Booth
• [Draft] Agenda, 24 June 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and showing messages David Orchard
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and s howing messages Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed David Orchard
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and showing messages David Orchard
• Issue 167: Synchronize pseudo-schema Jonathan Marsh
• Issue 157: Formalize processing model Jonathan Marsh
• Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Issue 210: component equivalence Mark Nottingham
• Re: Issue 210: component equivalence Roberto Chinnici
• Re: Issue 210: component equivalence Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Issue 212: binding defaulting clarification Asir Vedamuthu
• part 1: description of Binding Operation component [editorial] Mark Nottingham
• Re: Issue 210: component equivalence Mark Nottingham
• Issue 212: binding defaulting clarification Mark Nottingham

Monday, 21 June 2004

• Re: Issue 210: component equivalence Roberto Chinnici
• Re: Issues 225: new proposals Roberto Chinnici
• Issue 210: component equivalence Mark Nottingham
• Issue 211: Omitting interface messages in bindings Mark Nottingham

Saturday, 19 June 2004

• FW: WSDL 2.0 Last Call Schedule Jonathan Marsh
• Minutes, 17 June 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh

Friday, 18 June 2004

• Re: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns Mark Nottingham
• Re: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns Mark Nottingham
• Re: Agenda, 17 June 2004 WS Desc telcon Sanjiva Weerawarana
• review of LC drafts of XMLP specs Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and s howing messages Mark Baker

Thursday, 17 June 2004

• Re: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns Mark Nottingham
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and s howing messages Liu, Kevin
• Re: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and s howing messages David Booth
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and s howing messages Mark Baker
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and showing messages paul.downey@bt.com
• Paradies Bundesrepublik - Rente fuer die Welt - #Key:1356# kaz@w3.org
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and s howing messages David Orchard
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and s howing messages Mark Baker

Wednesday, 16 June 2004

• Issues 225: new proposals Mark Nottingham
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) Prasad Yendluri
• RE: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) David Orchard
• Re: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns David Booth
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) Roberto Chinnici
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) Umit Yalcinalp
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) Mark Nottingham
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and s howing messages David Orchard
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) Roberto Chinnici
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and showing messages David Orchard
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) Roberto Chinnici
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and s howing messages Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and s howing messages Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns Mark Nottingham
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) Roberto Chinnici
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) Prasad Yendluri
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) Roberto Chinnici
• Re: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns Mark Nottingham
• Re: Agenda, 17 June 2004 WS Desc telcon Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) Roberto Chinnici
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and showing messages paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) Tom Jordahl
• Re: Which operation? Mark Baker
• RE: Which operation? Jim Webber

Tuesday, 15 June 2004

• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Agenda, 17 June 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Jonathan Marsh
• Comments - WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns Mark Nottingham
• Re: Which operation? Mark Baker
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and s howing messages Liu, Kevin
• Re: Which operation? Mark Baker
• RE: Which operation? Liu, Kevin
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Which operation? Ugo Corda
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) Mark Nottingham
• RE: Which operation? Liu, Kevin
• Re: Which operation? Mark Nottingham
• [corrected] Minutes, 10 June 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: WSDL 2.0 Last Call Schedule paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Which operation? Mark Baker
• RE: documenting pseudo schema lang Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Which operation? Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Which operation? paul.downey@bt.com
• documenting pseudo schema lang Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Which operation? Mark Baker
• WSDL 2.0 Last Call Schedule (Regrets for July 1) Helen Chen
• RE: WSDL 2.0 Last Call Schedule (Regrets for July 1) Peter Madziak
• RE: Which operation? paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Which operation? Mark Baker
• Re: Which operation? Mark Nottingham
• Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) Mark Nottingham

Monday, 14 June 2004

• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and showing messages David Orchard
• Re: Which operation? David Booth
• RE: WSDL 2.0 Last Call Schedule David Orchard
• Re: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and showing messages Sanjiva Weerawarana
• WSDL Issues champions Jonathan Marsh
• WSDL 2.0 Last Call Schedule Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and showing messages David Orchard
• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Ugo Corda
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Ugo Corda
• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Martin Gudgin
• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Tom Jordahl
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Ugo Corda
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Amelia A Lewis
• Call For Participation: 2004 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2004) Patrick C. K. Hung

Saturday, 12 June 2004

• Re: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and showing messages Mark Baker

Friday, 11 June 2004

• Issue 213: appropriate expression of property constraints Mark Nottingham
• Re: Issues 223, 224: Component Model definition (proposal) Mark Nottingham
• RE: Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Ugo Corda
• Fwd: Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. David Booth
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. David Booth
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. David Booth
• Optimization hints based on expected media types Hugo Haas
• RE: Issue 216: RPC and Schema dependency Tom Jordahl
• Re: Minutes, 10 June 2004 WS Desc telcon Hugo Haas
• Re: Issue 217: Syntax for multiple styles Hugo Haas

Thursday, 10 June 2004

• Issues 223, 224: Component Model definition (proposal) Mark Nottingham
• RE: Issue 217: Syntax for multiple styles paul.downey@bt.com
• Minutes, 10 June 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Cross-binding HTTP Features Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: Cross-binding HTTP Features David Orchard
• Cross-binding HTTP Features Asir Vedamuthu
• Action Item fulfillment: issue 155 Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Issue 212: Generic operations (proposal) Mark Nottingham
• RE: Issue 217: Syntax for multiple styles Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Issue 217: Syntax for multiple styles paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Issue 217: Syntax for multiple styles Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Issue 217: Syntax for multiple styles paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Agenda, 10 June 2004 WS Desc telcon Hugo Haas
• Re: Features: required implementation and use (was Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.) Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Issue 216: RPC and Schema dependency Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Issue 217: Syntax for multiple styles Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Issue 212: Generic operations (proposal) Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: June 10, likely regrets Bijan Parsia
• June 10, likely regrets Bijan Parsia
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and showing messages David Orchard
• Re: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and showing messages Mark Baker
• Issue 216: RPC and Schema dependency Mark Nottingham
• Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and showing messages David Orchard

Wednesday, 9 June 2004

• Issue 212: Generic operations (proposal) Mark Nottingham
• RE: Features: required implementation and use (was Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.) Ugo Corda
• RE: Features: required implementation and use (was Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.) paul.downey@bt.com
• Issue 217: Syntax for multiple styles Mark Nottingham
• RE: XML 1.1 support proposals Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: Features: required implementation and use (was Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.) Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Core Mark Nottingham
• RE: Features: required implementation and use (was Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Core paul.downey@bt.com
• Agenda, 10 June 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• FW: Last Call for SOAP Message Optimization related specs Jonathan Marsh
• RE: trying to execute editorial action item to incorporate Jacek's text Jonathan Marsh
• RE: XML 1.1 support proposals paul.downey@bt.com

Tuesday, 8 June 2004

• XML 1.1 support proposals Jonathan Marsh
• trying to execute editorial action item to incorporate Jacek's text Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Features: required implementation and use (was Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.) Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Features: required implementation and use (was Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.) Martin Gudgin
• RE: Features: required implementation and use (was Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.) paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Features: required implementation and use (was Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.) Martin Gudgin
• RE: Features: required implementation and use (was Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.) paul.downey@bt.com
• Features: required implementation and use (was Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.) Hugo Haas

Monday, 7 June 2004

• [corrected] Minutes, 3 June 2004 WS Description teslcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Ugo Corda
• ** deadline extended **: Call for Papers for ICSOC '04 Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Glen Daniels
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Marc Hadley
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Hugo Haas
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Marc Hadley
• should WSDL be used to describe existing HTTP resources? paul.downey@bt.com
• CFP: The International Journal of Web Services Research (JWSR) Patrick C. K. Hung
• CFP: International Journal of Business Process Integration and Management (IJBPIM) Patrick C. K. Hung

Saturday, 5 June 2004

• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Ugo Corda
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Prasad Yendluri
• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Ugo Corda
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Prasad Yendluri
• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Ugo Corda
• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Ugo Corda
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Prasad Yendluri
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Prasad Yendluri

Friday, 4 June 2004

• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Ugo Corda
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Marc Hadley
• Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Jonathan Marsh

Thursday, 3 June 2004

• Minutes, 3 June 2004 WS Description teslcon Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Indicating element nodes that must be optimized with XOP Hugo Haas
• RE: Indicating element nodes that must be optimized with XOP Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: Proposal: map HTTP fault codes to interface faults Hugo Haas
• RE: Proposal: map HTTP fault codes to interface faults paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Indicating element nodes that must be optimized with XOP Ugo Corda
• Re: Indicating element nodes that must be optimized with XOP Hugo Haas
• Re: Indicating element nodes that must be optimized with XOP Hugo Haas

Wednesday, 2 June 2004

• RE: Agenda, 3 June 2004 WS Desc telcon David Orchard
• Agenda, 3 June 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Indicating element nodes that must be optimized with XOP Ugo Corda
• Re: Indicating element nodes that must be optimized with XOP Hugo Haas
• Re: Indicating element nodes that must be optimized with XOP Hugo Haas
• RE: Expressing MTOM/XOP using feature syntax Glen Daniels
• Re: Expressing MTOM/XOP using feature syntax Prasad Yendluri
• Re: Indicating element nodes that must be optimized with XOP Prasad Yendluri

Tuesday, 1 June 2004

• RE: Indicating element nodes that must be optimized with XOP Ugo Corda
• Re: Proposal: map HTTP fault codes to interface faults Hugo Haas
• Re: Indicating element nodes that must be optimized with XOP Hugo Haas
• Re: Indicating element nodes that must be optimized with XOP Herve Ruellan

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 June 2004 23:48:18 UTC