W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2004

RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.

From: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 17:38:52 -0700
Message-ID: <EDDE2977F3D216428E903370E3EBDDC903958D71@MAIL01.stc.com>
To: "Prasad Yendluri" <pyendluri@webmethods.com>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Yes, sorry. I meant base64Binary.

	-----Original Message-----
	From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:pyendluri@webmethods.com] 
	Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 5:29 PM
	To: Ugo Corda
	Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org; xml-dist-app@w3.org
	Subject: Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.
	Did you  mean Base64Binary and not base64Decimal here?
	Regards, Prasad
	Ugo Corda wrote:

			Perhaps the right middle ground is to provide a
hook that designates 
			elements that are guaranteed to be in base64
canonical form, and that are 

			suggested as optimization candidates?

		Could that be achieved by defining a subtype of
base64Decimal that only
		allows canonical representations, and associating that
subtype in the
		WSDL with the element we care about?
Received on Friday, 4 June 2004 20:39:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:41 UTC