Yes, sorry. I meant base64Binary. Ugo -----Original Message----- From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:pyendluri@webmethods.com] Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 5:29 PM To: Ugo Corda Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org; xml-dist-app@w3.org Subject: Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Ugo, Did you mean Base64Binary and not base64Decimal here? Regards, Prasad Ugo Corda wrote: Perhaps the right middle ground is to provide a hook that designates elements that are guaranteed to be in base64 canonical form, and that are suggested as optimization candidates? Could that be achieved by defining a subtype of base64Decimal that only allows canonical representations, and associating that subtype in the WSDL with the element we care about? UgoReceived on Friday, 4 June 2004 20:39:24 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:41 UTC