www-ws-desc@w3.org from June 2004 by author

Amelia A Lewis

• Issue 197 action: proposed text (Wednesday, 30 June)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Tuesday, 29 June)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Tuesday, 29 June)
• Re: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Thursday, 24 June)
• Re: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns (Friday, 18 June)
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) (Thursday, 17 June)
• Re: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: Agenda, 17 June 2004 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) (Tuesday, 15 June)
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) (Tuesday, 15 June)
• Re: Which operation? (Tuesday, 15 June)
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Monday, 14 June)
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Monday, 14 June)
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Monday, 14 June)
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Monday, 14 June)
• Action Item fulfillment: issue 155 (Thursday, 10 June)

Asir Vedamuthu

• RE: Application Data Feature and related stuff (Tuesday, 29 June)
• RE: Application Data Feature and related stuff (Tuesday, 29 June)
• RE: Application Data Feature and related stuff (Thursday, 24 June)
• RE: expectedMediaType and Accept header syntax (was Re: Action it em: HTTP binding for accepts header and output Serialization.) (Thursday, 24 June)
• Type of expectedMediaType element ?? (Thursday, 24 June)
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and s howing messages (Wednesday, 23 June)
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and s howing messages (Tuesday, 22 June)
• RE: Issue 212: binding defaulting clarification (Tuesday, 22 June)
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and s howing messages (Wednesday, 16 June)
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and s howing messages (Wednesday, 16 June)
• RE: Cross-binding HTTP Features (Thursday, 10 June)
• Cross-binding HTTP Features (Thursday, 10 June)
• RE: XML 1.1 support proposals (Wednesday, 9 June)
• RE: Features: required implementation and use (was Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.) (Wednesday, 9 June)
• RE: Indicating element nodes that must be optimized with XOP (Thursday, 3 June)

Bijan Parsia

• Re: June 10, likely regrets (Thursday, 10 June)
• June 10, likely regrets (Thursday, 10 June)

David Booth

• Issue 168 (Which Operation?) / Requirement R114 (Wednesday, 30 June)
• RE: Issue 157: Formalize processing model (Wednesday, 23 June)
• Re: Issue 157: Formalize processing model (Tuesday, 22 June)
• Re: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and s howing messages (Thursday, 17 June)
• Re: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: Which operation? (Monday, 14 June)
• Fwd: Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Friday, 11 June)
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Friday, 11 June)
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Friday, 11 June)

David Orchard

• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Wednesday, 30 June)
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Tuesday, 29 June)
• Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Tuesday, 29 June)
• Revised Asynch Binding (Tuesday, 29 June)
• RE: Application Data Feature and related stuff (Monday, 28 June)
• RE: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Friday, 25 June)
• RE: Action item: HTTP binding for accepts header and output Serialization. (Thursday, 24 June)
• RE: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Thursday, 24 June)
• RE: Issue 169: Syntax for webMethod - property or attribute? (Thursday, 24 June)
• Action item: HTTP binding for accepts header and output Serialization. (Thursday, 24 June)
• RE: Issue 214: Refine "properties" terminology (Wednesday, 23 June)
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and showing messages (Tuesday, 22 June)
• RE: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Tuesday, 22 June)
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and showing messages (Tuesday, 22 June)
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and s howing messages (Thursday, 17 June)
• RE: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) (Wednesday, 16 June)
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and s howing messages (Wednesday, 16 June)
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and showing messages (Wednesday, 16 June)
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and showing messages (Monday, 14 June)
• RE: WSDL 2.0 Last Call Schedule (Monday, 14 June)
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and showing messages (Monday, 14 June)
• RE: Cross-binding HTTP Features (Thursday, 10 June)
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and showing messages (Thursday, 10 June)
• Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and showing messages (Thursday, 10 June)
• RE: Agenda, 3 June 2004 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 2 June)

Glen Daniels

• RE: Application Data Feature and related stuff (Tuesday, 29 June)
• RE: Application Data Feature and related stuff (Tuesday, 29 June)
• RE: Application Data Feature and related stuff (Sunday, 27 June)
• Application Data Feature and related stuff (Wednesday, 23 June)
• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Monday, 7 June)
• RE: Expressing MTOM/XOP using feature syntax (Wednesday, 2 June)

Hao.He@thomson.com

• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Thursday, 1 July)

Helen Chen

• WSDL 2.0 Last Call Schedule (Regrets for July 1) (Tuesday, 15 June)

Herve Ruellan

• Re: Indicating element nodes that must be optimized with XOP (Tuesday, 1 June)

Hugo Haas

• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Wednesday, 30 June)
• Re: Issue 218 - Justify Interface Faults (Monday, 28 June)
• Re: updated draft to put F&P in more places (Monday, 28 June)
• Re: Action item: HTTP binding for accepts header and output Serialization. (Friday, 25 June)
• Re: expectedMediaType and Accept header syntax (was Re: Action it em: HTTP binding for accepts header and output Serialization.) (Friday, 25 June)
• expectedMediaType and Accept header syntax (was Re: Action item: HTTP binding for accepts header and output Serialization.) (Thursday, 24 June)
• Part 3: Relating serializations to operation styles (Thursday, 24 June)
• Re: Action item: HTTP binding for accepts header and output Serialization. (Thursday, 24 June)
• Optimization hints based on expected media types (Friday, 11 June)
• Re: Minutes, 10 June 2004 WS Desc telcon (Friday, 11 June)
• Re: Issue 217: Syntax for multiple styles (Friday, 11 June)
• Re: Agenda, 10 June 2004 WS Desc telcon (Thursday, 10 June)
• Features: required implementation and use (was Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.) (Tuesday, 8 June)
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Monday, 7 June)
• Re: Indicating element nodes that must be optimized with XOP (Thursday, 3 June)
• Re: Proposal: map HTTP fault codes to interface faults (Thursday, 3 June)
• Re: Indicating element nodes that must be optimized with XOP (Thursday, 3 June)
• Re: Indicating element nodes that must be optimized with XOP (Thursday, 3 June)
• Re: Indicating element nodes that must be optimized with XOP (Wednesday, 2 June)
• Re: Indicating element nodes that must be optimized with XOP (Wednesday, 2 June)
• Re: Proposal: map HTTP fault codes to interface faults (Tuesday, 1 June)
• Re: Indicating element nodes that must be optimized with XOP (Tuesday, 1 June)

Jacek Kopecky

• WS-Description WG's LC comments on XMLP specs (Friday, 25 June)
• Re: Issue 157: Formalize processing model (Wednesday, 23 June)
• review of LC drafts of XMLP specs (Friday, 18 June)
• RE: Issue 217: Syntax for multiple styles (Thursday, 10 June)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

• Re: Features: required implementation and use (was Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.) (Thursday, 10 June)
• Re: Issue 216: RPC and Schema dependency (Thursday, 10 June)
• Re: Issue 217: Syntax for multiple styles (Thursday, 10 June)
• Re: Issue 212: Generic operations (proposal) (Thursday, 10 June)

Jeff Mischkinsky

• Re: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Friday, 25 June)
• Re: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Friday, 25 June)

Jim Webber

• RE: Which operation? (Wednesday, 16 June)

Jonathan Marsh

• Agenda, 1 July 2004 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 30 June)
• RE: Action item: HTTP binding for accepts header and output Serialization. (Wednesday, 30 June)
• RE: updated draft to put F&P in more places (Wednesday, 30 June)
• RE: Issue 177: XML 1.1 support (Wednesday, 30 June)
• Issue 177: XML 1.1 support (Friday, 25 June)
• Minutes, 24 June 2004 WS Desc telcon (Thursday, 24 June)
• [final] Agenda, 24 June 2004 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 23 June)
• RE: Issue 214: Refine "properties" terminology (Wednesday, 23 June)
• Issue 214: Refine "properties" terminology (Wednesday, 23 June)
• Issue 169: Syntax for webMethod - property or attribute? (Wednesday, 23 June)
• RE: Issue 157: Formalize processing model (Wednesday, 23 June)
• RE: Issue 160 [was 157]: Formalize processing model (Wednesday, 23 June)
• RE: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Wednesday, 23 June)
• [Draft] Agenda, 24 June 2004 WS Desc telcon (Tuesday, 22 June)
• Issue 167: Synchronize pseudo-schema (Tuesday, 22 June)
• Issue 157: Formalize processing model (Tuesday, 22 June)
• Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Tuesday, 22 June)
• FW: WSDL 2.0 Last Call Schedule (Saturday, 19 June)
• Minutes, 17 June 2004 WS Desc telcon (Saturday, 19 June)
• Agenda, 17 June 2004 WS Desc telcon (Tuesday, 15 June)
• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Tuesday, 15 June)
• [corrected] Minutes, 10 June 2004 WS Desc telcon (Tuesday, 15 June)
• RE: documenting pseudo schema lang (Tuesday, 15 June)
• WSDL Issues champions (Monday, 14 June)
• WSDL 2.0 Last Call Schedule (Monday, 14 June)
• Minutes, 10 June 2004 WS Desc telcon (Thursday, 10 June)
• RE: Issue 217: Syntax for multiple styles (Thursday, 10 June)
• Agenda, 10 June 2004 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 9 June)
• FW: Last Call for SOAP Message Optimization related specs (Wednesday, 9 June)
• RE: trying to execute editorial action item to incorporate Jacek's text (Wednesday, 9 June)
• XML 1.1 support proposals (Tuesday, 8 June)
• [corrected] Minutes, 3 June 2004 WS Description teslcon (Monday, 7 June)
• Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Friday, 4 June)
• Minutes, 3 June 2004 WS Description teslcon (Thursday, 3 June)
• Agenda, 3 June 2004 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 2 June)

kaz@w3.org

• Paradies Bundesrepublik - Rente fuer die Welt - #Key:1356# (Thursday, 17 June)

Liu, Kevin

• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and s howing messages (Thursday, 17 June)
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and s howing messages (Tuesday, 15 June)
• RE: Which operation? (Tuesday, 15 June)
• RE: Which operation? (Tuesday, 15 June)

Marc Hadley

• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Monday, 7 June)
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Monday, 7 June)
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Friday, 4 June)

Mark Baker

• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Thursday, 1 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Wednesday, 30 June)
• Re: Issue 169: Syntax for webMethod - property or attribute? (Thursday, 24 June)
• Re: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and s howing messages (Friday, 18 June)
• Re: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and s howing messages (Thursday, 17 June)
• Re: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and s howing messages (Thursday, 17 June)
• Re: Which operation? (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: Which operation? (Tuesday, 15 June)
• Re: Which operation? (Tuesday, 15 June)
• Re: Which operation? (Tuesday, 15 June)
• Re: Which operation? (Tuesday, 15 June)
• Re: Which operation? (Tuesday, 15 June)
• Re: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and showing messages (Saturday, 12 June)
• Re: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and showing messages (Thursday, 10 June)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Tuesday, 29 June)
• Namespacing component properties (Tuesday, 29 June)
• Re: Issue 218 - Justify Interface Faults (Monday, 28 June)
• Re: Issue 214: Refine "properties" terminology (Friday, 25 June)
• Re: Issue 210: component equivalence (Tuesday, 22 June)
• part 1: description of Binding Operation component [editorial] (Tuesday, 22 June)
• Re: Issue 210: component equivalence (Tuesday, 22 June)
• Issue 212: binding defaulting clarification (Tuesday, 22 June)
• Issue 210: component equivalence (Monday, 21 June)
• Issue 211: Omitting interface messages in bindings (Monday, 21 June)
• Re: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns (Friday, 18 June)
• Re: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns (Friday, 18 June)
• Re: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns (Thursday, 17 June)
• Issues 225: new proposals (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Comments - WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns (Tuesday, 15 June)
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) (Tuesday, 15 June)
• Re: Which operation? (Tuesday, 15 June)
• Re: Which operation? (Tuesday, 15 June)
• Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) (Tuesday, 15 June)
• Issue 213: appropriate expression of property constraints (Friday, 11 June)
• Re: Issues 223, 224: Component Model definition (proposal) (Friday, 11 June)
• Issues 223, 224: Component Model definition (proposal) (Thursday, 10 June)
• Re: Issue 212: Generic operations (proposal) (Thursday, 10 June)
• Issue 216: RPC and Schema dependency (Thursday, 10 June)
• Issue 212: Generic operations (proposal) (Wednesday, 9 June)
• Issue 217: Syntax for multiple styles (Wednesday, 9 June)
• Re: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Core (Wednesday, 9 June)

Martin Gudgin

• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Monday, 14 June)
• RE: Features: required implementation and use (was Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.) (Tuesday, 8 June)
• RE: Features: required implementation and use (was Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.) (Tuesday, 8 June)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Tuesday, 15 June)
• RE: Features: required implementation and use (was Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.) (Wednesday, 9 June)
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Friday, 4 June)

Patrick C. K. Hung

• Call For Participation: 2004 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2004) (Monday, 14 June)
• CFP: The International Journal of Web Services Research (JWSR) (Monday, 7 June)
• CFP: International Journal of Business Process Integration and Management (IJBPIM) (Monday, 7 June)

paul.downey@bt.com

• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Wednesday, 30 June)
• RE: Application Data Feature and related stuff (Tuesday, 29 June)
• RE: Application Data Feature and related stuff (Tuesday, 29 June)
• RE: Application Data Feature and related stuff (Tuesday, 29 June)
• RE: Minutes, 24 June 2004 WS Desc telcon (Friday, 25 June)
• RE: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Friday, 25 June)
• RE: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Thursday, 24 June)
• RE: Application Data Feature and related stuff (Thursday, 24 June)
• Issue 218 - Justify Interface Faults (Wednesday, 23 June)
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and showing messages (Thursday, 17 June)
• RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and showing messages (Wednesday, 16 June)
• RE: WSDL 2.0 Last Call Schedule (Tuesday, 15 June)
• RE: Which operation? (Tuesday, 15 June)
• RE: Which operation? (Tuesday, 15 June)
• RE: Issue 217: Syntax for multiple styles (Thursday, 10 June)
• RE: Issue 217: Syntax for multiple styles (Thursday, 10 June)
• RE: Issue 217: Syntax for multiple styles (Thursday, 10 June)
• RE: Features: required implementation and use (was Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.) (Wednesday, 9 June)
• RE: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Core (Wednesday, 9 June)
• RE: XML 1.1 support proposals (Wednesday, 9 June)
• RE: Features: required implementation and use (was Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.) (Tuesday, 8 June)
• RE: Features: required implementation and use (was Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.) (Tuesday, 8 June)
• should WSDL be used to describe existing HTTP resources? (Monday, 7 June)
• RE: Proposal: map HTTP fault codes to interface faults (Thursday, 3 June)

Peter Madziak

• RE: WSDL 2.0 Last Call Schedule (Regrets for July 1) (Tuesday, 15 June)

Prasad Yendluri

• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Saturday, 5 June)
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Saturday, 5 June)
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Saturday, 5 June)
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Saturday, 5 June)
• Re: Expressing MTOM/XOP using feature syntax (Wednesday, 2 June)
• Re: Indicating element nodes that must be optimized with XOP (Wednesday, 2 June)

Roberto Chinnici

• Re: updated draft to put F&P in more places (Monday, 28 June)
• Re: Issue 210: component equivalence (Tuesday, 22 June)
• Re: Issue 210: component equivalence (Monday, 21 June)
• Re: Issues 225: new proposals (Monday, 21 June)
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) (Wednesday, 16 June)

Sanjiva Weerawarana

• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Wednesday, 30 June)
• Re: Application Data Feature and related stuff (Tuesday, 29 June)
• Re: updated draft to put F&P in more places (Monday, 28 June)
• Re: Minutes, 24 June 2004 WS Desc telcon (Friday, 25 June)
• updated draft to put F&P in more places (Friday, 25 June)
• Re: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Friday, 25 June)
• Re: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Thursday, 24 June)
• Re: Issue 169: Syntax for webMethod - property or attribute? (Thursday, 24 June)
• Re: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Thursday, 24 June)
• Re: [Draft] Agenda, 24 June 2004 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 23 June)
• Re: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Wednesday, 23 June)
• Re: Issue 212: binding defaulting clarification (Wednesday, 23 June)
• Re: Issue 210: component equivalence (Wednesday, 23 June)
• Re: Issue 157: Formalize processing model (Wednesday, 23 June)
• Re: Issue 210: component equivalence (Tuesday, 22 June)
• Re: Agenda, 17 June 2004 WS Desc telcon (Friday, 18 June)
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) (Thursday, 17 June)
• Re: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns (Thursday, 17 June)
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) (Wednesday, 16 June)
• documenting pseudo schema lang (Tuesday, 15 June)
• Re: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and showing messages (Monday, 14 June)
• trying to execute editorial action item to incorporate Jacek's text (Tuesday, 8 June)
• Re: Features: required implementation and use (was Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.) (Tuesday, 8 June)
• ** deadline extended **: Call for Papers for ICSOC '04 (Monday, 7 June)

Tom Jordahl

• RE: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Wednesday, 23 June)
• RE: Issue 210: component equivalence (Wednesday, 23 June)
• RE: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Wednesday, 23 June)
• RE: Issue 212: binding defaulting clarification (Wednesday, 23 June)
• RE: Issue 210: component equivalence (Wednesday, 23 June)
• RE: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) (Wednesday, 16 June)
• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Monday, 14 June)
• RE: Issue 216: RPC and Schema dependency (Friday, 11 June)

Ugo Corda

• RE: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Wednesday, 23 June)
• RE: Which operation? (Tuesday, 15 June)
• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Monday, 14 June)
• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Monday, 14 June)
• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Monday, 14 June)
• RE: Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Friday, 11 June)
• RE: Features: required implementation and use (was Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.) (Wednesday, 9 June)
• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Monday, 7 June)
• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Saturday, 5 June)
• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Saturday, 5 June)
• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Saturday, 5 June)
• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Saturday, 5 June)
• RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Friday, 4 June)
• RE: Indicating element nodes that must be optimized with XOP (Thursday, 3 June)
• RE: Indicating element nodes that must be optimized with XOP (Wednesday, 2 June)
• RE: Indicating element nodes that must be optimized with XOP (Tuesday, 1 June)

Umit Yalcinalp

• Re: Issue 168 (Which Operation?) / Requirement R114 (Wednesday, 30 June)
• Re: Issue 177: XML 1.1 support (Monday, 28 June)
• Re: expectedMediaType and Accept header syntax (was Re: Action it em: HTTP binding for accepts header and output Serialization.) (Thursday, 24 June)
• Re: Issue 130: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Thursday, 24 June)
• Re: Issue 225: accommodating non-XML data models (proposal) (Wednesday, 16 June)

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 June 2004 23:48:18 UTC