RE: Issue 217: Syntax for multiple styles

Issue 98 was resolved at the 5th February telcon:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Feb/att-0035/040205-ws-desc-irc.htm#item07 <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Feb/att-0035/040205-ws-desc-irc.htm> 
http://tinyurl.com/3y7fy 
 
followed by Jacek withrawing his proposal, Issue 113:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Feb/att-0035/040205-ws-desc-irc.htm#item08

http://tinyurl.com/yq25p 
 
Paul
 
-----Original Message----- 
From: Jonathan Marsh [mailto:jmarsh@microsoft.com] 
Sent: Thu 10/06/2004 15:40 
To: Downey,PS,Paul,XSJ67A C; jacek.kopecky@deri.at 
Cc: jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr; mark.nottingham@bea.com; www-ws-desc@w3.org 
Subject: RE: Issue 217: Syntax for multiple styles

As Jacek points out, we did reject this proposal already, and I don't see any new information being presented.  I'm reluctant to reopen issues, but I'm willing to do it along the rules proposed in many of the latest charters being approved - that is, a supermajority (2/3) of the members in Good Standing.  I won't put this on this week's telcon, but perhaps next week's (or an email poll).