- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:46:09 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Advance warning on this week's agenda. Please be as prepared as last
week to accept the proposals on the table - pushback in advance by email
if you have an issue or question is the only way we'll be able to get
through this much material. I'll try to push each issue along to that
state.
Glen & David, if we don't see an ADD proposal, I'll move to close the
issue with no action or dig up your previous proposals and just do a
majority vote. You've had many weeks to reconcile, we're fast running
out of time. Grrrr!
June 24th (2 hour telcon)
Issues scheduled for closure:
112 Glen/DaveO Part 1 Design New headers/body style?
130 DaveO Part 3 Design Need async request/response HTTP binding
157 Glen Part 1 Design f&p at the service level
160 Jacek Part 1 Design Formalize processing model
167 Hugo Part 1 Ed Synchronize pseudo-schema
169 DaveO Part 1 Design Syntax for webMethod - property or
attribute?
209 Mark Part 1 Design Reference frag ids from media type
registration
214 Mark Part 1 Design Refine "properties" terminology
219 Mark Part 1 Design Actual value vs. normalized value
220 Mark Part 1 Design Document interface extension semantics
225 Mark Part 1 Design Non-XML type system extensibility.
-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 1:03 PM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: WSDL 2.0 Last Call Schedule
Follows is an aggressive but I think doable schedule for getting WSDL
2.0 to last call. It will take either a greater ability by the WG to
address issues by email, or by the chair to declare issues closed if
there are no proposals forthcoming. If we miss this schedule and are
still resolving issues in London, our August holiday will be scrapped to
keep publication from slipping into September.
June 17th (2 hour telcon)
Issues scheduled for closure:
174 Jonathan Part 1 Design Tie WSDL conformance to XML conformance?
175 Jonathan Part 1 Design Is it valid for a XML 1.1 document to
import
or include a XML 1.0 document (and vice
versa)?
176 Jonathan Part 1 Design Can a WSDL 2.0 XML 1.1 document contain
(or
reference), a XML Schema 1.0 type
description?
177 Jonathan Part 1 Design Normative dependence on XML Schema 1.0
precludes XML 1.1
207 WG Part 3 Design How to mark which elements to optimize
212 Mark Part 1 Design Explain using bindings across all
operations
216 Mark Part 1 Design RPC and XML Schema not orthogonal
217 Mark Part 1 Design Syntax for multiple styles
221 Mark Part 1 Design Identify components by URI
222 Mark Part 1 Design Name[space] for the intended semantics
223 Mark Part 1 Design Import/include processing model
224 Mark Part 1 Design Formalize component model
June 24th (2 hour telcon)
Issues scheduled for closure:
112 Glen/DaveO Part 1 Design New headers/body style?
130 DaveO Part 3 Design Need async request/response HTTP binding
157 Glen Part 1 Design f&p at the service level
160 Jacek Part 1 Design Formalize processing model
167 Hugo Part 1 Ed Synchronize pseudo-schema
169 DaveO Part 1 Design Syntax for webMethod - property or
attribute?
209 Mark Part 1 Design Reference frag ids from media type
registration
214 Mark Part 1 Design Refine "properties" terminology
219 Mark Part 1 Design Actual value vs. normalized value
220 Mark Part 1 Design Document interface extension semantics
225 Mark Part 1 Design Non-XML type system extensibility.
July 1st (2 hour telcon)
Issues scheduled for closure:
135 Jonathan/Arthur/DavidB Part 1 Ed WSDL Specification
readability
158 ? Part 3 Design Setting HTTP headers in the HTTP binding
159 WG Part 1 Design Messages with mixed Body content or
multiple element content
168 ? Part 1 Design Which operation
189 DaveO Part 3 Design Binding message content to URI
195 DaveO Part 1 Design Property value merging
197 ? Part 1 Design Don't override interface feature
requiredness
in binding
210 ? Part 1 Design Refine equivalence algorithm
211 ? Part 1 Design Omit interface message in binding?
218 ? Part 1 Design Justify interface faults.
July 8th (90 min telcon):
Any leftover issues
July 15th (90 min telcon):
Editors complete editorial work for WG review.
July 22nd (90 min or less telcon):
Approval of Last Call drafts.
July 26th WSDL 2.0 Last Call publication.
July 29th (no telcon)
Aug 2-5th (London FTF):
Early Last Call comments
Media Type Desciprtion
Primer
RDF Mapping
CR preparation
Aug 6th-30th
WG holiday
Sept 2nd (90 min telcon)
Resume regular telcons.
Received on Friday, 18 June 2004 20:46:43 UTC