- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 21:05:09 +0600
- To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, <paul.downey@bt.com>, <hugo@w3.org>, <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
- Cc: <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>, "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
"Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> writes: > > 1) that setting the MTOM feature for a message indicates that a > > sender may optionally send soap+xml or a mime package, but the > > receiver mustUnderstand MTOM messages regardless of the state > > within an MEP. If a receiver is unable to process MTOM messages > > then it should use another endpoint, binding or interface. > > I'm not sure I understand the above. If the WSDL description of an > endpoint says that the endpoint supports MTOM, then that endpoint had > better be able to consume and/or emit MTOM messages ( depending on > whether you can state MTOM support at the binding, operation or > input/output level ). +1. Sanjiva.
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2004 11:05:45 UTC