- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:14:45 -0700
- To: "Asir Vedamuthu" <asirv@webmethods.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
awesome review. Comments inline.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Asir Vedamuthu [mailto:asirv@webmethods.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 11:53 AM
> To: David Orchard; www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP
> binding and
> showing messages
>
>
> One of your observations is,
>
> "Overall, there is an explosion of schemas and operations
> that are needed
> because of the binding. I think this kind of sucks and comes
> close to making
> the http binding useless as it stands."
>
> I am not surprised by your statement, "there is an explosion
> of schemas and
> operations that are needed". XML Schema is a language for
> describing the
> structure and contents of XML documents. In this case, we are
> using XML
> Schema + binding for describing the path and query component
> of URI data
> model. This is a stretch. But, not free though. It comes with
> a certain
> level of pain :-(
>
> I am surprised by your statement, "comes close to making the
> http binding
> useless". I request you to explain why?
If I am creating an HTTP based web service, would I use WSDL 2.0 HTTP binding or some other description format (text?) for describing my service? In my mind, I don't see this adding much value for an Amazon/Atom/some other service because of the complexity and lack of re-use of the schema constructs. For example, we have to create a "GET/PUT/POST/DELETE" operation for interactions with each level of the hierarchy, ie Artist, Album, Artist properties, Album properties. I would have thought we could have some way of more simply saying "I've got a structure of Artists + props, Albums + props, and they are completely RESTFUL, which means you can do GET/PUT/POST/DELETE on various nodes in the tree". But this is just my personal observation.
>
> I would expect the following restrictions (in addition to
> what is spelled
> out in RPC style [1]) on XML schema for URI style:
>
> (a) {target namespace} of an element declaration [2] in the
> complex type
> that defines the body of an input element MUST be absent.
>
> Why? In David's example,
> "<xs:element name="ArtistQuery">
> <xs:complexType>
> <xs:complexContent>
> <xs:extension base="tns:ArtistIDBase">
> <xs:sequence>
> <xs:element name="Name" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/>
> <xs:element name="Genre" type="xs:string"
> minOccurs="0"/> .."
>
> QName of element decl 'Genre' is,
> [target namespace] = http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/music/2004/
> [name] = Genre
>
> I am not aware of a mechanism to serialize this QName to URI
> path/query
> component.
Are suggesting that we should change it to say that the target namespace MUST be ignored? Or that my example is broken?
I did suggest a # of mechanisms for how to serialize a QName into a URI...
>
>
> (b) {type definition} of an element declaration [2] in the
> complex type that
> defines the body of an input element MUST be a simple type.
>
> Why? I am not aware of a mechanism to serialize a complex
> type value to URI.
> In part 3, I read a statement close to this, but not quite
> the same - "If
> the children elements of the input sequence are defined using
> an XML Schema
> type, they MUST derive from xsd:simpleType, .." [3].
> 'xsd:simpleType' is the
> xml rep of a simple type. There isn't any simple type whose name is
> xsd:simpleType.
>
I'm not sure what you are suggesting. I think roughly we are trying to define a mechanism for serializing a subset of the contents of a simpleType into a URI.
>
> (c) {type definition} of an element declaration [2] in the
> complex type that
> defines the body of an input element MUST NOT be a xs:QName,
> xs:NOTATION, or
> any simple type derived from xs:QName or xs:NOTATION.
>
> Why? Lexical rep of these types are context sensitive, aka
> namespace binding
> context. I am not aware of a mechanism to specify namespace
> bindings (other
> than XPointer xmlns() scheme) in a URI path/query component.
>
See above. I think we are trying to make sure we don't have to serialize a namespace name into a URI. I think we could come up with a standardized Qname to URI binding, or a parameterized QName to URI binding with one such binding defined.
>
> PS: I don't know why URI style places a restriction on binary
> simple types:
> "MUST NOT derive from xsd:hexBinary or xsd:base64Binary" [3].
> Any thoughts?
>
> [1]
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20
> .html#RPCStyle
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#Element_Declaration_details
> [3]
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20
> -bindings.html
> #_operation_uri_style
>
> Asir
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
> [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of David Orchard
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 1:23 PM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP
> binding and
> showing messages
>
>
>
> As promised, I've updated the music example. I fixed the
> bugs that Asir
> pointed out, added a number of design notes, put more
> comments in the WSDL,
> added another couple of examples, added HTML formatting.
>
> http://www.pacificspirit.com/Authoring/wsdl/ArtistWSDL2uriform
> encoding.html
>
> Hopefully this will be more useful to reviewers.
>
> Cheers,
> Dave
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
> [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On
> > Behalf Of David Orchard
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 5:12 PM
> > To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> > Subject: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and
> > showing messages
> >
> >
> >
> > This is potential primer material that explores how to use
> > the WSDL http binding to describe interactions with an HTTP
> > service. This is an example of music information and
> > purchasing Web service. It is styled after the CDDB database
> > http://www.gracenote.com/gn_products/cddb.html and
> > allmusic.com sites. It has generated a number of questions
> > where I don't think the WSDL as exists can express certain
> > things. I'm grateful for any reviews or comments on this.
> > It could be put into the primer as well.
> >
> > An Artist has:
> > - ID
> > - Name
> > - Biography
> > - Genre
> > - Image
> > - Web site
> >
> > Clients have 3 types of interactions: retrieve all/specific
> > information, change/add/delete information, and search based
> > upon a subset of the Artist fields.
> >
> > - Get Artist complete information for a given Artist
> > - Get Artist field contents (Name, Biography, etc.) for a
> > given Artist
> > - Add Artist
> > - Update Artist
> > - Get Artist list by Artist name, genre
> >
> > Schema
> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> > <xs:schema
> > targetNamespace="http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/music/2004/"
> > xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
> > xmlns:tns="http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/music/2004/"
> > elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified">
> > <xs:element name="Music">
> > <xs:complexType name="Music">
> > <xs:sequence>
> > <xs:element ref="tns:Artist" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
> > <xs:element ref="tns:ArtistRef" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
> > <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/>
> > </xs:sequence>
> > </xs:complexType>
> > </xs:element>
> >
> > <!-- To do a /Music/Artist/5, need to have a type with only
> > 1 child -->
> > <xs:complexType name="ArtistIDBase">
> > <xs:sequence>
> > <xs:element name="id" type="xs:ID"/>
> > </xs:sequence>
> > </xs:complexType>
> >
> > <!-- When Adding an artist, the ID isn't known -->
> > <xs:element name="ArtistWithoutID">
> > <xs:complexType name="ArtistWithoutId">
> > <xs:sequence>
> > <xs:element name="Name" type="xs:string"/>
> > <xs:element name="Biography" type="xs:string"/>
> > <xs:element name="Genre" type="xs:string"/>
> > <xs:element name="Image" type="xs:anyURI"/>
> > <xs:element name="Site" type="xs:anyURI"/>
> > <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/>
> > </xs:sequence>
> > </xs:complexType>
> > </xs:element>
> >
> > <!-- Need to have ID + all of the fields for <artist> returns -->
> > <!-- probably better modelling in schema to combine the id
> > with the non-id fields -->
> > <xs:element name="Artist">
> > <xs:complexType name="Artist">
> > <xs:complexContent>
> > <xs:extension base="tns:ArtistIDBase">
> > <xs:sequence>
> > <xs:element name="Name" type="xs:string"/>
> > <xs:element name="Biography" type="xs:string"/>
> > <xs:element name="Genre" type="xs:string"/>
> > <xs:element name="Image" type="xs:anyURI"/>
> > <xs:element name="Site" type="xs:anyURI"/>
> > <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/>
> > </xs:sequence>
> > </xs:extension>
> > </xs:complexContent>
> > </xs:complexType>
> > </xs:element>
> >
> > <!-- Need a query structure to do queries, ie
> &name=thieverycorp -->
> > <xs:element name="ArtistQuery">
> > <xs:complexType name="ArtistQuery">
> > <xs:complexContent>
> > <xs:extension base="tns:ArtistIDBase">
> > <xs:sequence>
> > <xs:element name="Name" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/>
> > <xs:element name="Genre" type="xs:string"
> minOccurs="0"/>
> > <xs:element name="Rating" type="xs:decimal"
> > minOccurs="0"/>
> > </xs:sequence>
> > </xs:extension>
> > </xs:complexContent>
> > </xs:complexType>
> > </xs:element>
> >
> > <!-- ID + REF structure for getting back list of IDs that
> > can be used to create URI -->
> > <xs:element name="ArtistIDRef">
> > <xs:complexType name="ArtistIDRef">
> > <xs:complexContent>
> > <xs:extension base="tns:ArtistIDBase">
> > <xs:sequence>
> > <xs:element name="Name" type="xs:string"/>
> > </xs:sequence>
> > </xs:extension>
> > </xs:complexContent>
> > </xs:complexType>
> > </xs:element>
> >
> > <!-- Artist Field names for doing field queries -->
> > <xs:element name="ArtistIDFieldName" type="tns:ArtistField"/>
> > <xs:complexType name="ArtistField">
> > <xs:complexContent>
> > <xs:extension base="tns:ArtistIDBase">
> > <xs:sequence>
> > <xs:element name="Field" type="tns:ArtistFieldNames"/>
> > </xs:sequence>
> > </xs:extension>
> > </xs:complexContent>
> > </xs:complexType>
> >
> > <!-- Artist Field Name + Value for setting field -->
> > <xs:element name="ArtistFieldNameAndValue">
> > <xs:complexType name="ArtistFieldNameAndValue">
> > <xs:complexContent>
> > <xs:extension base="tns:ArtistField">
> > <xs:sequence>
> > <xs:element name="Value"/>
> > </xs:sequence>
> > </xs:extension>
> > </xs:complexContent>
> > </xs:complexType>
> > </xs:element>
> >
> > <!-- List of field names -->
> > <xs:simpleType name="ArtistFieldNames">
> > <xs:restriction base="xs:string">
> > <xs:enumeration value="Name"/>
> > <xs:enumeration value="Biography"/>
> > <xs:enumeration value="Genre"/>
> > <xs:enumeration value="Image"/>
> > <xs:enumeration value="Site"/>
> > </xs:restriction>
> > </xs:simpleType>
> >
> > <!-- URI for getting back opaque URIs -->
> > <xs:complexType name="uri">
> > <xs:sequence>
> > <xs:element name="uri" type="xs:anyURI"/>
> > </xs:sequence>
> > </xs:complexType>
> > </xs:schema>
> >
> >
> >
> > Interacting using the x-www-form-uriencoded style
> > WSDL
> >
> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> > <wsdl:definitions xmlns:musicw="http://example.com/Artist"
> > xmlns:wsdl="">
> > <xs:import href="Music-Artist.xsd"/>
> > <wsdl:interface name="Artist">
> > <wsdl:operation name="ArtistSearch" method="GET">
> > <wsdl:input ref="music:ArtistQuery"/>
> > <wsdl:output ref="music:Music"/>
> > </wsdl:operation>
> > <wsdl:operation name="ArtistRefSearch" method="GET">
> > <wsdl:input ref="music:ArtistQuery"/>
> > <wsdl:output ref="music:Music"/>
> > </wsdl:operation>
> > <wsdl:operation name="GetArtist" method="GET">
> > <wsdl:input ref="music:ArtistID"/>
> > <wsdl:output ref="music:Artist"/>
> > </wsdl:operation>
> >
> > <!-- Given a uri in a field for an artist,
> > simply dereference the URI -->
> > <wsdl:operation name="GetArtistOpaqueURI" method="GET">
> > <wsdl:input ref="music:uri"/>
> > <wsdl:output ref="music:ArtistWithoutURI"/>
> > </wsdl:operation>
> >
> > <wsdl:operation name="GetFieldByFieldName" method="GET">
> > <wsdl:input ref="music:ArtistFieldName"/>
> > <wsdl:output ref="xsd:any"/>
> > </wsdl:operation>
> > <wsdl:operation name="AddArtistServerID" method="POST">
> > <wsdl:input ref="music:ArtistWithoutID"/>
> > <wsdl:output ref="music:ArtistRef"/>
> > </wsdl:operation>
> > <wsdl:operation name="AddArtistClientID" method="POST">
> > <wsdl:input ref="music:Artist"/>
> > <wsdl:output ref="music:ArtistRef"/>
> > </wsdl:operation>
> > <wsdl:operation name="DeleteArtist" method="DELETE">
> > <wsdl:input ref="music:ArtistID"/>
> > </wsdl:operation>
> > <wsdl:operation name="UpdateArtist" method="PUT">
> > <wsdl:input ref="music:Artist"/>
> > <wsdl:output ref="music:Artist"/>
> > </wsdl:operation>
> > <wsdl:operation name="UpdateField" method="PUT">
> > <wsdl:input
> > ref="music:ArtistFieldNameAndValue"/>
> > </wsdl:operation>
> >
> > </wsdl:interface>
> > <wsdl:binding name="Artist" interface="Artist"
> > http:defaultMethod="GET">
> > <wsdl:operation ref="ArtistSearch" location="Artist/{Name}"/>
> > <wsdl:operation ref="ArtistRefSearch"
> > location="ArtistRef/{Name}"/>
> > <wsdl:operation ref="GetArtist" location="Artist/{ID}"/>
> > <wsdl:operation ref="GetArtistOpaqueURI" location="{uri}"/>
> > <wsdl:operation ref="GetFieldByFieldname"
> > location="Artist/{ID}/"/>
> > <wsdl:operation ref="AddArtistServerID"
> > location="Artist" method="POST"/>
> > <wsdl:operation ref="AddArtistClientID"
> > location="Artist" method="POST"/>
> > <wsdl:operation ref="DeleteArtist"
> > location="Artist/{ID}" method="DELETE"/>
> > <wsdl:operation ref="UpdateArtist"
> > location="Artist/{ID}" method="PUT"/>
> > <wsdl:operation ref="UpdateArtistField"
> > location="Artist/{ID}" method="PUT"/>
> > </wsdl:binding>
> > </wsdl:definitions>
> >
> > Message Examples
> >
> > Example: ArtistSearch
> > GET /Music/Artist?genre="electronica"
> >
> > Return:
> > <Music>
> > <Artist>
> > <ID>5</ID>
> > <Name>Thievery Corp</Name>
> > <Genre>Electronica</Genre>
> > <site>http://thievery.com</site>
> > </Artist>
> > </Music>
> >
> > Example: GetAllArtists
> > GET /Music/Artist
> >
> > Returns:
> > <Music>
> > <Artist>
> > <ID>5</ID>
> > <Name>Thievery Corp</Name>
> > <Genre>Electronica</Genre>
> > <site>http://thievery.com</site>
> > </Artist>
> > </Music>
> >
> > Example: GetArtistReferences
> > GET /Music/ArtistRef?genre="electronica"
> >
> > Return:
> > <Music>
> > <ArtistRef>
> > <ID>5</ID>
> > <Name>Thievery Corp</Name>
> > </ArtistRef>
> > </Music>
> >
> > Example: GetArtist
> > GET /Music/Artist/5
> >
> > Return:
> > <Artist>
> > <ID>5</ID>
> > <Name>Thievery Corp</Name>
> > <Genre>Electronica</Genre>
> > <site>http://thievery.com</site>
> > </Artist>
> >
> > Example: GetArtistOpaqueURI
> > * This assumes the URI="id/xyz"
> > GET /Music/Artist/id/zyz
> >
> > Return:
> > <Artist>
> > <Name>Thievery Corp</Name>
> > <Genre>Electronica</Genre>
> > <site>http://thievery.com</site>
> > </Artist>
> >
> >
> > Example: GetFieldByFieldName
> > GET /Music/Artist/5?field="site"
> >
> > Return:
> > <site>http://thievery.com</site>
> >
> > Example: AddArtistServerId
> > POST /Music/Artist
> > <Artist>
> > <Name>Thievery Corp version 2</Name>
> > <Genre>Electronica</Genre>
> > <site>http://newbetterthievery.com</site>
> > </Artist>
> >
> > Returns:
> > Content-Location: /Music/Artist/6
> > * How is the HTTP Content-location mapped to xml in this
> > case? Is it dropped? Should there be XML returned?
> >
> > Example: AddArtistClientID
> > * I don't think this works in the current WSDL http binding
> > POST /Music/Artist/7
> > <Artist>
> > <ID>7</ID>
> > <Name>Thievery Corp version 3</Name>
> > <Genre>Electronica</Genre>
> > <site>http://newwaybetterthievery.com</site>
> > </Artist>
> >
> > Returns:
> > Content-Location: /Music/Artist/7
> >
> > Example: DeleteArtist
> > DELETE /Music/Artist/5
> >
> > Example: UpdateArtist
> > * I don't think this works in the current WSDL http binding
> > PUT /Music/Artist/5
> > <Artist>
> > <ID>5</ID>
> > <Name>Thievery Corp</Name>
> > <Genre>Electronica</Genre>
> > <site>http://newbetterthievery.com</site>
> > </Artist>
> >
> > Example: UpdateArtistField
> > * I don't think this works in the wsdl as is
> > PUT /Music/Artist/5/site
> > <site>http://newbetterthievery.com</site>
> >
> >
>
Received on Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:14:46 UTC