- From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 07:23:26 +0200
- To: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
- Cc: Herve Ruellan <herve.ruellan@crf.canon.fr>, www-ws-desc@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 3 June 2004 01:23:27 UTC
Hi Ugo. * Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> [2004-06-02 09:35-0700] > I assume your response only applies to case 2. For case 1, it would be > unreasonable for the service provider to expect the element to be > optimized. Maybe there is something I'm missing about case 1: can certain base64 blobs not be be serialized in canonical lexical form? I had assumed that this limitation in XOP was only applying to intermediaries: they may receive an element which is not in canonical lexical representation; if their job was for example to XOP-optimize the SOAP message, then they would not be able to. However, for the message originator, I thought that it always had the choice and therefore it was not a problem. If I am designing my application and I have to use XOP, then I should be able to do so. If I can't for some reason, then I should not use a service that requires XOP-optimization of some things. Am I missing something? Regards, Hugo -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Thursday, 3 June 2004 01:23:27 UTC