- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:26:49 +0600
- To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, "Web Services Description" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Hi Jonathan, > ?ED 2004-05-19: Editors to fix component model to remove > default* properties, use mapping from syntax > instead. (Issue 182) Done (for SOAP). > ?ED 2004-05-21: Sanjiva to implement the resolution that > @soapaction not there means no soapaction. > (Issue 1) Done. > ?ED 2004-05-21: Part 3 Editors to add a statement to relate > each of the two soap meps to wsdl meps. > (Issue 191) Done as part of default rules. > ?ED 2004-05-21: Editors to add ednotes to the spec to > indicate areas that had contention. (Issue > 190) Can people indicate where they'd like these notes to go? I know of places IBM has contention with but not necessarily where everyone has contention with .. > ?ED 2004-05-21: Editors to write up that we allow > http:version etc. in the soap binding when > the protocol is http. (Issue 190) DaveO has done this but it needs to be updated to reflect new style of binding (attribute centric). > ?ED 2004-05-21: Editors to update part 3 to say that for SOAP > Response MEPs the URI will be generated > following the HTTP binding rules for > generating a URI (for GET). (Issue 61) Done as part of default rules. > ?ED 2004-05-21: Editors to update soap binding default rules > to allow use of MTOM. (Issue 184) Done. > ?ED 2004-06-10: Editors should correct issues 208, 213, > 215, come back to WG if there are any > questions. > ?ED 2004-06-17: Editor action to check that multiple style > values are allowed. > ?ED 2004-06-17: Editors to adopt Mark's proposal for 216, but > reword using MUST. > ?ED 2004-06-17: Editors to incorporate editorial fix addressing > issue 222. > ?ED 2004-06-17: Editors to incorporate proposed resolution for > 223 and 224. > ?ED 2004-06-17: Editors to incorporate David Booth's clarification > in section 8.3. TBD .. getting too late. Sanjiva.
Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2004 15:27:21 UTC