- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 13:03:16 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
I'll be coming out with a schedule to get WSDL 2.0 to last call shortly. Part of that is organizing the disposition of our remaining issues. The following list of open WSDL 2.0 issues groups them roughly into categories, blesses the obvious champions for most of the issues, and highlights those that don't have champions. A Champion is someone who cares about the issue and has put forward a proposal (often this is the same party who raised the issue.) Please: 1) let me know if you object to being listed as the champion of any issues. 2) volunteer as champion for any unassigned issues that interest you, un-championed issues are in danger of chair championing "close without action"! Issues that need a champion, and a proposal or additional rationale: 158 ? Part 3 Design Setting HTTP headers in the HTTP binding 168 ? Part 1 Design Which operation 197 ? Part 1 Design Don't override interface feature requiredness in binding 210 ? Part 1 Design Refine equivalence algorithm 211 ? Part 1 Design Omit interface message in binding? 218 ? Part 1 Design Justify interface faults. Issues assigned to editors (after editors have addressed them they will either be closed or their rejection championed by an editor.) 208 Mark Part 1 Ed Misc. editorial comments 213 Mark Part 1 Ed Refine component model property constraints 215 Mark Part 1 Ed Clarify rule obviation Issues with (more or less) concrete proposals (will be allotted 5 minutes of telcon time to accept the proposal or action opponent to develop an alternate proposal.) 130 DaveO Part 3 Design Need async request/response HTTP binding 157 Glen Part 1 Design f&p at the service level 160 Jacek Part 1 Design Formalize processing model 167 Hugo Part 1 Ed Synchronize pseudo-schema 169 DaveO Part 1 Design Syntax for webMethod - property or attribute? 174 Jonathan Part 1 Design Tie WSDL conformance to XML conformance? 175 Jonathan Part 1 Design Is it valid for a XML 1.1 document to import or include a XML 1.0 document (and vice versa)? 176 Jonathan Part 1 Design Can a WSDL 2.0 XML 1.1 document contain (or reference), a XML Schema 1.0 type description? 177 Jonathan Part 1 Design Normative dependence on XML Schema 1.0 precludes XML 1.1 209 Mark Part 1 Design Reference frag ids from media type registration 212 Mark Part 1 Design Explain using bindings across all operations 214 Mark Part 1 Design Refine "properties" terminology 216 Mark Part 1 Design RPC and XML Schema not orthogonal 217 Mark Part 1 Design Syntax for multiple styles 219 Mark Part 1 Design Actual value vs. normalized value 220 Mark Part 1 Design Document interface extension semantics 221 Mark Part 1 Design Identify components by URI 222 Mark Part 1 Design Name[space] for the intended semantics 223 Mark Part 1 Design Import/include processing model 224 Mark Part 1 Design Formalize component model 225 Mark Part 1 Design Non-XML type system extensibility. Issues with champions but need concrete proposals: 112 Glen/DaveO Part 1 Design New headers/body style? 189 DaveO Part 3 Design Binding message content to URI Issues with proposals, that need additional discussion: 135 Jonathan/Arthur/DavidB Part 1 Ed WSDL Specification readability 159 WG Part 1 Design Messages with mixed Body content or multiple element content 195 DaveO Part 1 Design Property value merging 207 WG Part 3 Design How to mark which elements to optimize
Received on Monday, 14 June 2004 16:03:36 UTC