- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 13:03:16 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
I'll be coming out with a schedule to get WSDL 2.0 to last call shortly.
Part of that is organizing the disposition of our remaining issues. The
following list of open WSDL 2.0 issues groups them roughly into
categories, blesses the obvious champions for most of the issues, and
highlights those that don't have champions. A Champion is someone who
cares about the issue and has put forward a proposal (often this is the
same party who raised the issue.)
Please:
1) let me know if you object to being listed as the champion of any
issues.
2) volunteer as champion for any unassigned issues that interest you,
un-championed issues are in danger of chair championing "close without
action"!
Issues that need a champion, and a proposal or additional rationale:
158 ? Part 3 Design Setting HTTP headers in the HTTP binding
168 ? Part 1 Design Which operation
197 ? Part 1 Design Don't override interface feature
requiredness
in binding
210 ? Part 1 Design Refine equivalence algorithm
211 ? Part 1 Design Omit interface message in binding?
218 ? Part 1 Design Justify interface faults.
Issues assigned to editors (after editors have addressed them they will
either be closed or their rejection championed by an editor.)
208 Mark Part 1 Ed Misc. editorial comments
213 Mark Part 1 Ed Refine component model property
constraints
215 Mark Part 1 Ed Clarify rule obviation
Issues with (more or less) concrete proposals (will be allotted 5
minutes of telcon time to accept the proposal or action opponent to
develop an alternate proposal.)
130 DaveO Part 3 Design Need async request/response HTTP binding
157 Glen Part 1 Design f&p at the service level
160 Jacek Part 1 Design Formalize processing model
167 Hugo Part 1 Ed Synchronize pseudo-schema
169 DaveO Part 1 Design Syntax for webMethod - property or
attribute?
174 Jonathan Part 1 Design Tie WSDL conformance to XML conformance?
175 Jonathan Part 1 Design Is it valid for a XML 1.1 document to
import
or include a XML 1.0 document (and vice
versa)?
176 Jonathan Part 1 Design Can a WSDL 2.0 XML 1.1 document contain
(or
reference), a XML Schema 1.0 type
description?
177 Jonathan Part 1 Design Normative dependence on XML Schema 1.0
precludes XML 1.1
209 Mark Part 1 Design Reference frag ids from media type
registration
212 Mark Part 1 Design Explain using bindings across all
operations
214 Mark Part 1 Design Refine "properties" terminology
216 Mark Part 1 Design RPC and XML Schema not orthogonal
217 Mark Part 1 Design Syntax for multiple styles
219 Mark Part 1 Design Actual value vs. normalized value
220 Mark Part 1 Design Document interface extension semantics
221 Mark Part 1 Design Identify components by URI
222 Mark Part 1 Design Name[space] for the intended semantics
223 Mark Part 1 Design Import/include processing model
224 Mark Part 1 Design Formalize component model
225 Mark Part 1 Design Non-XML type system extensibility.
Issues with champions but need concrete proposals:
112 Glen/DaveO Part 1 Design New headers/body style?
189 DaveO Part 3 Design Binding message content to URI
Issues with proposals, that need additional discussion:
135 Jonathan/Arthur/DavidB Part 1 Ed WSDL Specification
readability
159 WG Part 1 Design Messages with mixed Body content or
multiple element content
195 DaveO Part 1 Design Property value merging
207 WG Part 3 Design How to mark which elements to optimize
Received on Monday, 14 June 2004 16:03:36 UTC