- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 15:16:04 -0700
- To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
hmm, I don't recall that my "defaultWebMethod" on operations proposal was voted down. But I wouldn't be surprised if I missed that. I've been meaning to follow the trail on this issue. Cheers, Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana > Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 1:27 PM > To: David Orchard; www-ws-desc@w3.org > Subject: Re: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP > binding and > showing messages > > > > Hi Dave, > > > This is potential primer material that explores how to use the > > WSDL http binding to describe interactions with an HTTP service. > > Thanks for writing this up; very useful indeed! Big +1 for getting > it into the primer. > > > Interacting using the x-www-form-uriencoded style > > WSDL > > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > > <wsdl:definitions xmlns:musicw="http://example.com/Artist" > xmlns:wsdl=""> > > <xs:import href="Music-Artist.xsd"/> > > <wsdl:interface name="Artist"> > > <wsdl:operation name="ArtistSearch" method="GET"> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > What's that?? Unless I was totally asleep at the wheel I don't > recall operation/@method. What we have is of course the ability > to indicate operation safety via @safety .. is that what you > meant to use? > > Sanjiva. > >
Received on Monday, 14 June 2004 18:16:06 UTC