> I responded to this originally because you asked what the > point of out-only was. That was not my question. My question was what is the point of specifying the endpoint of the server in an out-only scenario (quoting from my original note: "what does that endpoint mean in the case of an Out-only pattern? Wouldn't it be more useful to have the endpoint declaration of the "requester" agent instead?"). My original statement, of course, is only meaningful in cases where there is only one node that the server is talking to (e.g. brokered notification). UgoReceived on Monday, 14 June 2004 13:16:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:41 UTC