- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 09:24:33 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
+1. I'm not sure I understand the second sentence though (the part before "i.e."). JJ. Mark Nottingham wrote: > > As explained in issue 212 [1], I think it would be valuable to allow > the description of a "default" binding operation component for a > particular endpoint, if the binding information is the same for many > or all of the operations that it implements. > > To enable this, I propose the following specific changes: > > - Add the following to 2.1.11, after the bullet list: > """A Binding Operation component without an {operation reference} > property is to be considered the default Binding Operation Component > for that Binding component; that is, it will be used by any > operations in the interface that does not have a corresponding > operation reference in the binding.""" > > - Add to the following sentence: > """This includes Binding Operation components without an {operation > reference} property; i.e., there may be only one such Binding > Operation component in a Binding component.""" > > - In 2.1.12, change: > A REQUIRED ref attribute information item as described below... > to: > An OPTIONAL ref attribute information item as described below... > > Regards, > > > 1. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd- > issues.html#x212 > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ >
Received on Thursday, 10 June 2004 03:25:19 UTC