- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:16:12 -0700
- To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
I'd suggest you put it in the Core spec as the WG agreed. Putting it somewhere else would mean reopening the issue, and being explicit about what "the purpose of the binding" is in the Core spec doesn't seem to cause obvious harm. > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana > Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 1:04 PM > To: www-ws-desc@w3.org > Subject: trying to execute editorial action item to incorporate Jacek's > text > > > I'm trying to do the following AI: > > ? 2004-04-29: Part 1 editors to adopt Jacek's "purpose of the > binding" text, without "interchangeable" > endpoints, and using "confidentiality" (or > similar) instead of TLS. > > > I picked up the text from: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0077.html > > While trying to splice this into part1 I've convinced myself that > this is not part1 kinda text. This really belongs in the primer > as some more verbiage on the roles of interace/binding/service > stuff as well as an example of a feature that makes sense to be > present at all levels. > > What do you think? > > Sanjiva.
Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2004 13:18:03 UTC