W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2004

Re: Comments - WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns

From: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:19:22 -0700
Message-Id: <B5F0449A-C071-11D8-AB5E-000A95BD86C0@bea.com>
Cc: "Amelia A Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>

What "generate a Fault" means in a SOAP context has always been 
confusing to people outside of the WGs; we wrangled over this for a 
while in XMLP, had to explain it to new people constantly, and ended up 
needing to clarify it in WS-I as well. I have a strong motivation not 
to add to the confusion.

What do you think about "propagation"?

On Jun 16, 2004, at 8:18 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:

> I like the current wording of fault generation rules .. I think its
> clear enough that it is generated and that what happens beyond that
> is unspecified by design.

Mark Nottingham   Principal Technologist
Office of the CTO   BEA Systems
Received on Thursday, 17 June 2004 11:19:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:41 UTC