- From: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:19:22 -0700
- To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Cc: "Amelia A Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
What "generate a Fault" means in a SOAP context has always been confusing to people outside of the WGs; we wrangled over this for a while in XMLP, had to explain it to new people constantly, and ended up needing to clarify it in WS-I as well. I have a strong motivation not to add to the confusion. What do you think about "propagation"? On Jun 16, 2004, at 8:18 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > I like the current wording of fault generation rules .. I think its > clear enough that it is generated and that what happens beyond that > is unspecified by design. > -- Mark Nottingham Principal Technologist Office of the CTO BEA Systems
Received on Thursday, 17 June 2004 11:19:27 UTC