W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2004

RE: Issue 216: RPC and Schema dependency

From: Tom Jordahl <tomj@macromedia.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 09:16:44 -0400
Message-ID: <CB1FF0A474AEA84EA0206D5B05F6A4CB085F7637@S1001EXM02.macromedia.com>
To: "'www-ws-desc@w3.org'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>


This seems like a change for the better and goes along with our goal if not
mandating XML Schema.

Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Mark Nottingham
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 8:15 PM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Issue 216: RPC and Schema dependency

Issue 216 [1] points out that the definition of the RPC style implies  
that it can only be used on messages described by XML Schema. This is  
an unnecessary restriction, and I propose the change below to avoid it.

In section 2.4.4 of part 1, change:

"""Use of this value indicates that XML Schema [XML Schema: Structures]  
was used to define the schemas of the  {element} properties of all  
{message reference} components of  the Interface Operation component.  
Those schemas MUST adhere to the rules below."""


"""Use of this value indicates that the associated messages conform to  
the rules below, described using XML Schema. Note that operations  
containing messages described by other type systems may also indicate  
use of the RPC encoding, as long as they are constructed in such a way  
as to follow these rules."""


Mark Nottingham   Principal Technologist
Office of the CTO   BEA Systems
Received on Friday, 11 June 2004 09:17:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:41 UTC