Re: updated draft to put F&P in more places

* Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> [2004-06-25 23:29+0600]
> I've updated the draft per the telecon decision yesterday to put
> F&P in a few more places. Please review.
> 
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html
> 
> I note (with disgust) that we're severly discriminating against
> Interface Fault components and Binding Fault components by not 
> allowing them to contain F&P (properties). Poor suckers.

I actually don't understand why this is either. Could somebody explain
the issue around having F&P on fault components?

Regards,

Hugo

-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/