w3c-dist-auth@w3.org from October to December 1999 by date

Friday, 31 December 1999

• Re: Locking URIs rather than Resources ccjason@us.ibm.com
• Re: Locking URIs rather than Resources Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: Locking URIs rather than Resources jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Re: Locking URIs rather than Resources Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: Locking URIs rather than Resources jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Re: Creating a lock-null in a locked collection Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: Locking URIs rather than Resources Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Locking URIs rather than Resources Yaron Goland (Exchange)
• Re: Creating a lock-null in a locked collection Joe Orton

Thursday, 30 December 1999

• Re: Creating a lock-null in a locked collection jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Re: Creating a lock-null in a locked collection Geoffrey M. Clemm
• RE: Creating a lock-null in a locked collection Yaron Goland (Exchange)
• New WebDAV client spotted at XML '99 David M. Chandler
• Creating a lock-null in a locked collection Joe Orton
• Re: COPY again.. Geoffrey M. Clemm

Wednesday, 29 December 1999

• COPY again.. Christian Scholz
• RE: Why are WebDAV's XML namespace rules different than the W3C's ? Yaron Goland (Exchange)
• Re: Why are WebDAV's XML namespace rules different than the W3C's? Jim Davis
• Re: Why are WebDAV's XML namespace rules different than the W3C's? jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Re: Why are WebDAV's XML namespace rules different than the W3C's? Greg Stein
• Re: COPY jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Why are WebDAV's XML namespace rules different than the W3C's? Yaron Goland (Exchange)
• COPY Christian Scholz

Tuesday, 28 December 1999

• Re: WG Last Call: Bindings Protocol ccjason@us.ibm.com
• Announce: python davserver 0.3 Christian Scholz
• Re: WG Last Call: Bindings Protocol Eric Sedlar
• Re: Exclusive Locking ... per lock type? Geoffrey M. Clemm
• WG Last Call: Bindings Protocol Jim Whitehead

Monday, 27 December 1999

• RE: Exclusive Locking ... per lock type? Jim Whitehead
• Exclusive Locking ... per lock type? Geoffrey M. Clemm

Thursday, 23 December 1999

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-binding-protocol-02.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

Wednesday, 22 December 1999

• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-binding-protocol-01.txt Slein, Judith A
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-ordering-protocol-02.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol-02.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol-02.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-ordering-protocol-02.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-binding-protocol-01.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

Tuesday, 21 December 1999

• Re: webfolders.mydocsonline.com server Joe Orton

Thursday, 16 December 1999

• Adv. Collections Teleconf. Minutes 12/1, 12/8, 12/15 Jim Whitehead

Saturday, 11 December 1999

• Zope: URI encoding problem Joe Orton
• Re: webfolders.mydocsonline.com server Greg Stein
• webfolders.mydocsonline.com server Joe Orton
• Re: BINDing using a weak reference Greg Stein

Friday, 10 December 1999

• Re: BINDing using a weak reference Eric Sedlar
• Re: BINDing using a weak reference Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: BINDing using a weak reference Eric Sedlar
• Re: BINDing using a weak reference Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Announce Christian Scholz

Thursday, 9 December 1999

• Re: BINDing using a weak reference Eric Sedlar
• Re: BINDing using a weak reference ccjason@us.ibm.com

Wednesday, 8 December 1999

• Re: BINDing using a weak reference Eric Sedlar
• Re: BINDing using a weak reference Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: BINDing using a weak reference ccjason@us.ibm.com

Tuesday, 7 December 1999

• Re: BINDing using a weak reference Eric Sedlar
• Re: BINDing using a weak reference Eric Sedlar
• Re: BINDing using a weak reference Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: BINDing using a weak reference Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: BINDing using a weak reference Eric Sedlar
• Re: BINDing using a weak reference Eric Sedlar
• Re: BINDing using a weak reference ccjason@us.ibm.com
• Re: BINDing using a weak reference Geoffrey M. Clemm

Saturday, 4 December 1999

• Re: Server-Maintained Orderings Jim Davis
• BINDing using a weak reference Eric Sedlar

Friday, 3 December 1999

• Server-Maintained Orderings Slein, Judith A
• Re: Unsubscribing from the WG list Ralph R. Swick

Thursday, 2 December 1999

• RE: Syntax Issues Jim Whitehead
• RE: Integrated XML browser/editor and WebDAV BOF at XML '99 Jim Whitehead
• RE: are depth 0 locks inherited by newly created children? Jim Davis

Wednesday, 1 December 1999

• RE: are depth 0 locks inherited by newly created children? Jim Whitehead
• Unsubscribing from the WG list Jim Whitehead
• RE: Office 2000 and properties atul.mathur@autodesk.com
• RE: Office 2000 and properties Jim Whitehead
• Re: Ordered Collections and PROPFIND Responses jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Access Control and JAAS jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Re: Ordered Collections and PROPFIND Responses Geoffrey Clemm

Tuesday, 30 November 1999

• Re: are depth 0 locks inherited by newly created children? Jim Davis
• RE: Ordered Collections and PROPFIND Responses Jim Davis
• RE: are depth 0 locks inherited by newly created children? Jim Davis
• RE: Ordered Collections and PROPFIND Responses Jim Davis

Wednesday, 1 December 1999

• Re: Ordered Collections and PROPFIND Responses ccjason@us.ibm.com

Tuesday, 30 November 1999

• RE: are depth 0 locks inherited by newly created children? InfoNuovo@cs.com
• RE: Ordered Collections and PROPFIND Responses Mark Birbeck
• Re: Ordered Collections and PROPFIND Responses Max Rible
• Re: are depth 0 locks inherited by newly created children? Geoffrey Clemm
• RE: Ordered Collections and PROPFIND Responses Kevin Wiggen
• RE: are depth 0 locks inherited by newly created children? Michael Hamilton
• RE: Ordered Collections and PROPFIND Responses Mark Birbeck
• Ordered Collections and PROPFIND Responses Slein, Judith A
• RE: are depth 0 locks inherited by newly created children? David M. Chandler
• Re: are depth 0 locks inherited by newly created children? Jim Davis
• Re: refresh LOCK for multiple locks Jim Davis
• Re: Lost with links ... Jim Davis

Monday, 29 November 1999

• Re: refresh LOCK for multiple locks ccjason@us.ibm.com
• Re: refresh LOCK for multiple locks ccjason@us.ibm.com

Sunday, 28 November 1999

• Re: Lost with links ... Geoffrey Clemm
• Re: refresh LOCK for multiple locks Geoffrey Clemm
• Re: Write Locks on Collections Geoffrey Clemm
• Re: Write Locks on Collections Geoffrey Clemm

Monday, 29 November 1999

• Re: Lost with links ... jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Re: Write Locks on Collections jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Re: are depth 0 locks inherited by newly created children? jamsden@us.ibm.com

Friday, 26 November 1999

• Re: getlastmodified and ISO8601 Joe Orton
• Lost with links ... Viktor Lioutyi
• RE: refresh LOCK for multiple locks Greg Stein
• Re: are depth 0 locks inherited by newly created children? ccjason@us.ibm.com
• Re: Write Locks on Collections Greg Stein
• RE: refresh LOCK for multiple locks ccjason@us.ibm.com
• Re: Write Locks on Collections ccjason@us.ibm.com
• Office 2000 and properties Lars-Gunnar.F.Fallman@telia.se
• Re: Write Locks on Collections Greg Stein
• Re: are depth 0 locks inherited by newly created children? Greg Stein
• RE: refresh LOCK for multiple locks Greg Stein

Thursday, 25 November 1999

• Re: Write Locks on Collections Jim Davis
• Re: Write Locks on Collections Jim Davis
• Re: are depth 0 locks inherited by newly created children? Jim Davis
• RE: refresh LOCK for multiple locks ccjason@us.ibm.com

Wednesday, 24 November 1999

• Re: getlastmodified and ISO8601 Greg Stein
• RE: refresh LOCK for multiple locks Greg Stein
• getlastmodified and ISO8601 Kevin Wiggen
• Re: Write Locks on Collections Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: Write Locks on Collections Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: Syntax Issues Juergen Reuter
• Re: Syntax Issues Juergen Reuter
• RE: refresh LOCK for multiple locks ccjason@us.ibm.com
• Re: Write Locks on Collections ccjason@us.ibm.com
• RE: LOCK request body? Greg Stein
• RE: LOCK request body? ccjason@us.ibm.com
• Re: Write Locks on Collections ccjason@us.ibm.com
• Re: Write Locks on Collections Greg Stein
• Re: Write Locks on Collections Jim Davis
• Re: Integrated XML browser/editor and WebDAV BOF at XML '99 Greg Stein
• RE: LOCK request body? Jim Whitehead
• Integrated XML browser/editor and WebDAV BOF at XML '99 David M. Chandler

Tuesday, 23 November 1999

• RE: LOCK request body? ccjason@us.ibm.com
• RE: Write Locks on Collections Kevin Wiggen
• Re: Write Locks on Collections Jim Davis
• Re: Write Locks on Collections Greg Stein
• Re: Write Locks on Collections Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Write Locks on Collections Kevin Wiggen
• RE: LOCK request body? Kevin Wiggen
• LOCK request body? Greg Stein
• RE: WebDAV and Dynamic Content Sean Lyndersay (Exchange)

Monday, 22 November 1999

• Re: WebDAV and Dynamic Content Jim Whitehead
• Re: WebDAV and Dynamic Content Greg Stein
• Re: WebDAV and Dynamic Content Serge Knystautas
• Re: WebDAV and Dynamic Content Roy T. Fielding
• Re: WebDAV and Dynamic Content Serge Knystautas

Sunday, 21 November 1999

• Re: WebDAV and Dynamic Content ccjason@us.ibm.com
• Re: WebDAV and Dynamic Content Serge Knystautas
• Re: WebDAV and Dynamic Content Jim Davis

Saturday, 20 November 1999

• Re: WebDAV and Dynamic Content Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: WebDAV and Dynamic Content Brett McCormick
• Re: WebDAV and Dynamic Content Serge Knystautas
• Re: WebDAV and Dynamic Content Roy T. Fielding
• Re: WebDAV and Dynamic Content Roy T. Fielding
• RE: WebDAV and Dynamic Content Sean Lyndersay (Exchange)
• RE: WebDAV and Dynamic Content Tapas Nayak (Exchange)

Friday, 19 November 1999

• Re: WebDAV and Dynamic Content Brett McCormick

Tuesday, 16 November 1999

• WebDAV and Dynamic Content jamsden@us.ibm.com

Thursday, 18 November 1999

• Re: FW: Clients using PROPPATCH? Jim Davis
• RE: interoperability testing with Xythos/Sharemation server Greg Stein
• RE: interoperability testing with Xythos/Sharemation server Kevin Wiggen
• Re: FW: Clients using PROPPATCH? Richard C.
• FW: Clients using PROPPATCH? Jim Whitehead
• Re: Syntax Issues Greg Stein
• RE: Syntax Issues Jim Whitehead

Wednesday, 17 November 1999

• Syntax Issues Juergen Reuter
• FW: Does zope mess with the body in a GET? Jim Whitehead

Tuesday, 16 November 1999

• FW: Does zope mess with the body in a GET? Jim Whitehead
• Re: rules for comparing coded URL in If header? (was Xythos interop) Joe Orton
• Re: FW: RE: Does zope mess with the body in a GET? Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: FW: RE: Does zope mess with the body in a GET? Dirk-Willem van Gulik
• rules for comparing coded URL in If header? (was Xythos interop) Jim Davis
• DAV:source (was: Does zope mess with the body in a GET?) Greg Stein
• RE: [Moderator Action] RE: Does zope mess with the body in a GET? Brett McCormick
• Re: FW: RE: Does zope mess with the body in a GET? Brett McCormick
• RE: [Moderator Action] RE: Does zope mess with the body in a GET? Jim Whitehead
• FW: RE: Does zope mess with the body in a GET? Jim Whitehead
• Re: locknull resources marjorie@us.ibm.com

Monday, 15 November 1999

• RE: interoperability testing with Xythos/Sharemation server Kevin Wiggen
• Re: locknull resources ccjason@us.ibm.com
• Re: can multiple propstat elements within response have same status Greg Stein
• can multiple propstat elements within response have same status Jim Davis
• Does zope mess with the body in a GET? Jim Davis
• Re: interoperability testing with Xythos/Sharemation server Jim Davis
• Re: further interop testing: IIS Windows 2000 Beta 3 Greg Stein
• further interop testing: IIS Windows 2000 Beta 3 Jim Davis
• Alternate DAV list archive Jim Whitehead

Sunday, 14 November 1999

• RE: Learning WebDAV Jim Whitehead
• FW: ANN: Beta test of CyberTeams WebDAV module and new Test Server Jim Whitehead
• FW: more interoperation: Cyberteams Webdav Jim Whitehead
• FW: Learning WebDAV Jim Whitehead
• FW: results of interoperability testing: tdav.py (client) vs five servers Jim Whitehead

Saturday, 13 November 1999

• Re: more interoperation: Cyberteams Webdav Dana Carson

Friday, 12 November 1999

• Notes on Advanced Collections from IETF 46 Slein, Judith A

Thursday, 11 November 1999

• Re: UNLOCK issues Geoffrey M. Clemm

Friday, 12 November 1999

• locknull resources Greg Stein

Sunday, 7 November 1999

• Re: UNLOCK issues jamsden@us.ibm.com
• UNLOCK issues Greg Stein

Friday, 5 November 1999

• Re: Jigsaw release David Sussman

Thursday, 4 November 1999

• Re: Jigsaw release Yves Lafon
• RE: Authentication in existing WebDAV servers Jim Whitehead
• Re: 2518, proppatch example, responsedescription problem jamsden@us.ibm.com

Wednesday, 3 November 1999

• 2518, proppatch example, responsedescription problem ccjason@us.ibm.com
• RE: Authentication in existing WebDAV servers Larry Masinter

Tuesday, 2 November 1999

• Agenda for WebDAV WG meeting in DC Jim Whitehead
• RE: Authentication in existing WebDAV servers Yaron Goland (Exchange)
• Re: Jigsaw release jamsden@us.ibm.com
• RE: Authentication in existing WebDAV servers Greg Stein
• RE: Authentication in existing WebDAV servers Yaron Goland (Exchange)
• Re: Authentication in existing WebDAV servers Greg Stein
• Re: One lock per resource per person? Geoffrey M. Clemm

Monday, 1 November 1999

• RE: One lock per resource per person? Chris Kaler (Exchange)
• Re: Authentication in existing WebDAV servers Richard C.
• Re: Authentication in existing WebDAV servers Greg Stein
• Re: Authentication in existing WebDAV servers Max Rible
• RE: Authentication in existing WebDAV servers Yaron Goland (Exchange)
• Jigsaw release David Sussman
• Re: Authentication in existing WebDAV servers jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Authentication in existing WebDAV servers Slein, Judith A

Friday, 29 October 1999

• Re: One lock per resource per person? ccjason@us.ibm.com

Thursday, 28 October 1999

• Re: why URL protection is not feasible when you version collectio ns Edgar Schwarz
• Re: One lock per resource per person? jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Re: Can you move a locked file? Geoffrey M. Clemm

Wednesday, 27 October 1999

• Re: Can you move a locked file? Greg Stein
• Re: why URL protection is not feasible when you version collectio ns WJCarpenter
• Re: Can you move a locked file? WJCarpenter
• Re: One lock per resource per person? Greg Stein
• Re: why URL protection is not feasible when you version collectio ns Keith Wannamaker
• RE: why URL protection is not feasible when you version collectio ns Greg Stein
• RE: why URL protection is not feasible when you version collectio ns Jim Whitehead
• Re: One lock per resource per person? jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Re: Simplifying RFC-2518 Locking: A proposal ccjason@us.ibm.com
• Re: why URL protection is not feasible when you version collectio ns Geoffrey M. Clemm
• RE: why URL protection is not feasible when you version collectio ns Yaron Goland (Exchange)
• Re: Can you move a locked file? Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: Can you move a locked file? jamsden@us.ibm.com
• why URL protection is not feasible when you version collections Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: Can you move a locked file? Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: One lock per resource per person? Greg Stein

Tuesday, 26 October 1999

• Re: Can you move a locked file? Greg Stein
• Re: Can you move a locked file? John Stracke

Monday, 25 October 1999

• RE: Moving forward on access control Yaron Goland (Exchange)
• DASL on Sharemation Jim Whitehead
• Moving forward on access control Jim Whitehead
• Re: Versioning spec review - 02.3 Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Breakouts on Advanced Collections, DASL, Delta-V at DC Jim Whitehead
• RE: Advanced Collections issues for the RFC 2518 Issues List Jim Whitehead
• Re: DELETE leaving a lock-null resource; was LOCK Scenarios ccjason@us.ibm.com

Sunday, 24 October 1999

• RE: Can you move a locked file? Yaron Goland (Exchange)
• Re: Can you move a locked file? Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Can you move a locked file? Yaron Goland (Exchange)
• Re: DELETE leaving a lock-null resource; was LOCK Scenarios Geoffrey M. Clemm

Saturday, 23 October 1999

• RE: DELETE leaving a lock-null resource; was LOCK Scenarios Yaron Goland (Exchange)
• Re: DELETE leaving a lock-null resource; was LOCK Scenarios Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: DELETE leaving a lock-null resource; was LOCK Scenarios Geoffrey M. Clemm

Thursday, 21 October 1999

• Final DC IETF meeting time: Mon., 7:30PM Jim Whitehead

Wednesday, 20 October 1999

• Advanced Collections issues for the RFC 2518 Issues List Slein, Judith A
• Re: Simplifying RFC-2518 Locking: A proposal Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: One lock per resource per person? ccjason@us.ibm.com
• Re: One lock per resource per person? Geoffrey M. Clemm

Tuesday, 19 October 1999

• RE: One lock per resource per person? jamsden@us.ibm.com
• RE: One lock per resource per person? Chris Kaler (Exchange)
• RE: Globally unique tokens. Was: One lock per resource per person? ccjason@us.ibm.com
• RE: Globally unique tokens. Was: One lock per resource per person? WJCarpenter
• Re: Versioning spec review - 02.3 jamsden@us.ibm.com
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol-01.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-ordering-protocol-01.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-binding-protocol-01.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
• Re: One lock per resource per person? ccjason@us.ibm.com
• RE: Globally unique tokens. Was: One lock per resource per person? ccjason@us.ibm.com
• New Advanced Collections I-Ds available Jim Whitehead

Monday, 18 October 1999

• RE: One lock per resource per person? Yaron Goland (Exchange)
• RE: Simplifying RFC-2518 Locking: A proposal WJCarpenter
• RE: One lock per resource per person? WJCarpenter
• Re: Simplifying RFC-2518 Locking: A proposal jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Re: Simplifying RFC-2518 Locking: A proposal John Stracke
• Re: Simplifying RFC-2518 Locking: A proposal John Stracke
• RE: Simplifying RFC-2518 Locking: A proposal jamsden@us.ibm.com
• RE: Simplifying RFC-2518 Locking: A proposal jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Simplifying RFC-2518 Locking: A second proposal Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: Simplifying RFC-2518 Locking: A proposal Edgar Schwarz
• RE: One lock per resource per person? Jim Whitehead
• RE: Simplifying RFC-2518 Locking: A proposal Jim Whitehead
• RE: Simplifying RFC-2518 Locking: A proposal Jim Whitehead

Sunday, 17 October 1999

• Re: Simplifying RFC-2518 Locking: A proposal, lock remapping ccjason@us.ibm.com
• Re: Simplifying RFC-2518 Locking: A proposal Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: Simplifying RFC-2518 Locking: A proposal ccjason@us.ibm.com

Friday, 15 October 1999

• RE: Why are lock tokens unique? ccjason@us.ibm.com
• Re: One lock per resource per person? ccjason@us.ibm.com
• RE: One lock per resource per person? WJCarpenter
• Re: Simplifying RFC-2518 Locking: A proposal jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Re: One lock per resource per person? jamsden@us.ibm.com
• One lock per resource per person? ccjason@us.ibm.com
• Re: resourcetype locknull jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Simplifying RFC-2518 Locking: A proposal Geoffrey M. Clemm
• RE: resourcetype locknull infonuovo@email.com
• Re: Static depth locking Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: resourcetype locknull Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: Static depth locking jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Re: resourcetype locknull David Motes
• Re: resourcetype locknull Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: resourcetype locknull John Stracke
• Re: Static depth locking Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: Static depth locking Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Static depth locking Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: resourcetype locknull Geoffrey M. Clemm
• RE: resourcetype locknull ccjason@us.ibm.com
• RE: resourcetype locknull Jim Whitehead

Thursday, 14 October 1999

• Re: resourcetype locknull WJCarpenter
• Re: resourcetype locknull WJCarpenter
• Re: resourcetype locknull Geoffrey M. Clemm
• RE: Revision names - id patterns jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Re: resourcetype locknull jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Re: resourcetype locknull Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: resourcetype locknull jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Re: resourcetype locknull Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: resourcetype locknull ccjason@us.ibm.com
• Re: resourcetype locknull ccjason@us.ibm.com
• Re: resourcetype locknull Albert Lunde
• Re: resourcetype locknull Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: resourcetype locknull Geoffrey M. Clemm
• New version of DAV4J jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Re: resourcetype locknull jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Re: resourcetype locknull jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Re: resourcetype locknull ccjason@us.ibm.com
• Re: resourcetype locknull Geoffrey M. Clemm

Wednesday, 13 October 1999

• Re: resourcetype locknull John Stracke
• Re: resourcetype locknull Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: resourcetype locknull jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Re: resourcetype locknull jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Re: resourcetype locknull Geoffrey M. Clemm
• resourcetype locknull ccjason@us.ibm.com
• RE: PROPPATCH Error minimization Tim Ellison OTT
• RE: WebDAV DTD Tim Ellison OTT
• RE: Simplifying RFC-2518 Locking: A non-proposal Edgar Schwarz

Tuesday, 12 October 1999

• Re: PROPPATCH Error minimization ccjason@us.ibm.com
• IETF meeting: Monday, 1930-2200 Jim Whitehead
• RE: WebDAV DTD Jim Whitehead
• Re: WebDAV DTD Tim Ellison OTT
• Re: WebDAV DTD John Stracke
• RE: WebDAV DTD Jim Whitehead
• RE: WebDAV DTD jamsden@us.ibm.com
• RE: WebDAV DTD Tim Ellison OTT
• Re: PROPPATCH Error minimization Tim Ellison OTT

Monday, 11 October 1999

• LOCK and UNLOCK methods jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Re: PROPPATCH Error minimization WJCarpenter
• Re: PROPPATCH Error minimization ccjason@us.ibm.com
• Re: PROPPATCH Error minimization Greg Stein
• Re: href element interpretation Greg Stein

Friday, 8 October 1999

• Re: PROPPATCH Error minimization ccjason@us.ibm.com
• Re: PROPPATCH Error minimization Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: PROPPATCH Error minimization jamsden@us.ibm.com

Thursday, 7 October 1999

• RE: href element interpretation Jim Whitehead
• Adv. Col. TeleConf minutes Oct. 6, 1999 Jim Whitehead
• Re: PROPPATCH Error minimization ccjason@us.ibm.com
• RE: Simplifying RFC-2518 Locking: A non-proposal WJCarpenter
• Re: href element interpretation Geoffrey M. Clemm
• Re: href element interpretation jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Simplifying RFC-2518 Locking: A non-proposal Geoffrey M. Clemm
• href element interpretation Tim Ellison OTT

Tuesday, 5 October 1999

• Re: Is it possible to license the Dav4J client? jamsden@us.ibm.com
• Is it possible to license the Dav4J client? William Bjorge

Monday, 4 October 1999

• Re: WebDAV DTD John Stracke
• FW: WebDAV DTD Jim Whitehead

Last message date: Friday, 31 December 1999 18:22:21 UTC