Re: Write Locks on Collections

At 11:35 AM 11/24/99 -0500, Geoffrey M. Clemm wrote:
>... propose that the statement in question be modified to explicitly
>state "internal member", since depth:0 locks should only affect the
>addition and removal of internal members.

internal members, as opposed to those added by, say, BIND?

Fine with me.

Received on Thursday, 25 November 1999 19:05:11 UTC