- From: Jim Davis <jrd3@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 00:30:50 +0100
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
At 11:35 AM 11/24/99 -0500, Geoffrey M. Clemm wrote: >... propose that the statement in question be modified to explicitly >state "internal member", since depth:0 locks should only affect the >addition and removal of internal members. internal members, as opposed to those added by, say, BIND? Fine with me.
Received on Thursday, 25 November 1999 19:05:11 UTC