- From: Joe Orton <joe@orton.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 14:28:41 +0000
- To: Jim Davis <jrd3@alum.mit.edu>
- Cc: Kevin Wiggen <wiggs@wiggenout.com>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
> I was passing a coded URL that had an explicit port (80) Is there a rule > about how to compare two coded URLs for identity, when one has an an > explicit port and the other has no port (it was using the default port, in > this case). Perhaps in RFC 2068? RFC2616 section 3.2.3 has it...ž "A port that is empty or not given is equivalent to the default port for that URI-reference;" joe
Received on Tuesday, 16 November 1999 09:39:19 UTC