- From: Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 00:58:57 -0800 (PST)
- To: Jim Davis <jrd3@alum.mit.edu>
- cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Jim Davis wrote: > A followup question for clarification > > Suppose I have a collection locked (at depth infinity), and I LOCK a null > resource (7.4) within it. > > Does this action constitute adding a resource "as an internal member URI > of a locked collection " as in 7.5? > > If so, then the locked-null resource now has two locks on it, right? Yup. That's what mod_dav does. Note that both locks must be shared. And here is something that is really whacky: now remove the new lock -- the lock-null resource should still stick around since it had inherited the lock from its parent collection. It will remain until that parent collection's lock has been removed. Fun, eh? :-) Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Wednesday, 24 November 1999 03:59:00 UTC