- From: <jamsden@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 13:14:44 -0400
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
No it wouldn't, unless we did something with URLs ending in /. Getting ugly isn't it. Albert-Lunde@nwu.edu (Albert Lunde) on 10/14/99 11:23:04 AM Please respond to Albert-Lunde@nwu.edu (Albert Lunde) To: gclemm@tantalum.atria.com cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org Subject: Re: resourcetype locknull > Having LOCK create a null resource as a side effect? > This can't be "no control coupling" Jim Amsden talking here! (:-). > > But seriously, I could easily live with this proposal. Although I am > aesthetically against control coupling of this kind (i.e. creating a > resource and locking a resource should be two separate and orthogonal > requests), I could live with it if that's what it takes to get rid > of lock null resources. But would this work if one intended to reserve a URL to create a collection? -- Albert Lunde Albert-Lunde@nwu.edu
Received on Thursday, 14 October 1999 13:15:59 UTC