- From: Jim Davis <jrd3@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 14:38:31 +0100
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
At 01:48 PM 12/1/99 -0800, Jim Whitehead wrote: > >The original intent was to have the inheritance behavior only apply to Depth >infinity locked collections, not to Depth 0 locked collections. Since >section 7.5 does not explicitly state a "depth infinity locked collection", >but only states a "lcoked collection", the section is ambiguous, and should >be clarified in a future revision of RFC 2518. I've added this to the >issues list, available at: Okay, that resolves that. I've modified tdav.py to reflect the intended behavior, and now I can confirm that the server at Sharemation is (so far as I can tell) in full compliance with RFC 2518.
Received on Thursday, 2 December 1999 08:41:07 UTC