- From: Geoffrey M. Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@rational.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Dec 1999 16:39:17 -0500
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Did section 8.10.6 of 2518 meant to say that an exclusive lock will fail if there already is a lock *of that locktype* on that resource, or if there is *any* exclusive lock there? I can see arguments for both directions, and implementors probably haven't thought that much about it since everybody is just doing write locks, but I assume the authors had one or the other in mind? Cheers, Geoff
Received on Monday, 27 December 1999 16:39:18 UTC