multiple-syntax-examples
New topics for NF&R
ACTION-288 Completed (in a different way)
question on schedule
comment on answer to comment... (OW/XML)
Other GRDDL concerns which should not be lost
approving responses to LC comments
draft response for 47 / MK1 (discussed in F2F5)
draft response for 41 / BP3 (discussed in last TC)
draft response for 39 / BP1 (discussed in last TC)
Draft Response to LC comment 42/AS1
Implemented Resolution of LC Comment 34 (TQ) on property chains in RDF-Based Semantics
Implemented Resolution on LC-Comment 16 ("lexical value") in RDF-Based Semantics
Draft for the response to LC comment 58 (fully typed functional-style syntax)
Throw it away!
draft response for LC comment 25 RIF2
draft response for 43b ZW3b
response for LC comment 23 JR1
Draft response to LC comment 46
[LC Response] To Michael Smith (was Re: The definition of entailment in the Direct Semantics document)
Last call comment - conformance/datatype map
Simpler editing of wiki tables
Availability
Agenda Amendment: JH1
Syntactic Conformance: "OWL 2 DL Ontology Document": sufficient definition?
Remote Participation at OWL F2F
abstract preamble and "guide to documents" (LCC 10, ...)
- Re: abstract preamble and "guide to documents" (LCC 10, ...)
- Re: abstract preamble and "guide to documents" (LCC 10, ...)
draft response for LC comment 16 (lexical value)
- Re: draft response for LC comment 16 (lexical value)
- RE: draft response for LC comment 16 (lexical value)
draft response to LC comment 56/57, TC1, Taylor Cowan
- Re: draft response to LC comment 56/57, TC1, Taylor Cowan
13th European Conference on Digital Libraries - Final Call for Tutorials, Workshops and Panels
3rd Draft response to LC comment 30 (FH4)
- Re: 3rd Draft response to LC comment 30 (FH4)
- RE: 3rd Draft response to LC comment 30 (FH4)
No teleconf next week (25th Feb)
possible responses for LC Comment 23 JR1
partial response for LC comment 21 JDB2
draft response for LC comment 32 CO1
- draft response for LC comment 62 JM1
- Re: draft response for LC comment 32 CO1
Update on NF&R
A proposal for addressing LC comment 58 (fully typed functional-style syntax)
[LC response] To Zhe Wu Re: OWL 2 LC Comments
Re: [LC response] To Jim Hendler (was Re: Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments)
2nd Draft response to LC comment 30 (FH4)
13th European Conference on Digital Libraries - Calls for Special Tracks
Draft response to LC comment 45
Draft response to LC comment 46
Draft response to LC comment 15
- Re: Draft response to LC comment 15
- Re: Draft response to LC comment 15
- RE: Draft response to LC comment 15
Draft response to LC comment 38 (editorial)
- Re: Draft response to LC comment 38 (editorial)
- Re: Draft response to LC comment 38 (editorial)
- Re: Draft response to LC comment 38 (editorial)
(second) draft response for LC comment 14
Re: Print out of Functional-style syntax has tiny fonts.
Re: Alan Ruttenberg: Re: notes from OWL and RIF datatype coordination meeting
- Re: Alan Ruttenberg: Re: notes from OWL and RIF datatype coordination meeting
- Re: Alan Ruttenberg: Re: notes from OWL and RIF datatype coordination meeting
TR1
Agenda TC 18/02/2009
ACTION-287: Draft of WG response to LC-Comment 51 / #1 (functional data properties)
Drafting responses to LC comments.
draft response for LC comment 14
Introduction
draft response for LC comment 53
What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled
- Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled
- Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled
- Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled
- Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled
- Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled
- Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled
- Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled
- Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled
- Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled
- Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled
- Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled
- Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled
- Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled
- Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled
- Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled
- Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled
- Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled
- Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled
ACTION-264: Discuss imports with Tim Redmond.
- Re: ACTION-264: Discuss imports with Tim Redmond.
- Re: ACTION-264: Discuss imports with Tim Redmond.
ACTION-278 (Unicode reference in rdf:text)
DRAFT response to comment #54, Jan Wielemaker
F2F agenda
proposed response to LC comment 55
proposed response to LC comment 43 sections 2,5,6
- RE: proposed response to LC comment 43 sections 2,5,6
- Re: proposed response to LC comment 43 sections 2,5,6
W3C Membership Survey
OWL WG
XML Schema last call documents and ACTION-252
Comments on NF&R
Dealing with LC comments
XML Schema 1.1 LCWD
notes from OWL and RIF datatype coordination meeting
- Re: notes from OWL and RIF datatype coordination meeting
- Re: notes from OWL and RIF datatype coordination meeting
Minutes of 2009-01-04 teleconf
Re: ACTION-268
OWL+RIF coordination meeting on datatypes
13th European Conference on Digital Libraries - Call for Tutorials, Workshops, DC papers, Panels
OWL 2 profile checker
ACTION-280 completed
draft for JH1 (keys)
ACTION-275: Unicode, XML, RDF references
- RE: ACTION-275: Unicode, XML, RDF references
- Re: ACTION-275: Unicode, XML, RDF references
- RE: ACTION-275: Unicode, XML, RDF references
- Re: ACTION-275: Unicode, XML, RDF references
Proposal for use of labels in Manchester Syntax ISSUE-146, ACTION-247
- Re: Proposal for use of labels in Manchester Syntax ISSUE-146, ACTION-247