- From: Christine Golbreich <cgolbrei@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:58:01 +0100
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
2009/2/24 Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>: > On 24 Feb 2009, at 18:40, Christine Golbreich wrote: > [snip] >> >> Ah! Oxford language is easier for some of us :-) > Don't know what that means :) non native English people prefer the language refered in Oxford English Dictionary, speaking expressions or idioms are more difficult for us to catch in general, that's it >> Members of the UFDTF and of the WG asked for keeping UCS as Appendix. > > Sure. And, as a member of the UFDTF and the WG, I'm asking (have asked) for > it to be removed. I'm sorry to have connected that debate (which we've not > haved) with this one (which was narrower...I didn't understand that when I > made the comment). > >> Along with your action you advocated to have pointers to OWLED instead > > Yes. > >> Seeems that there has been today a discussion on that as well > > Not really. > >> BTW the specific concerned UCs related to N-ary came from Manchester, >> if I remember correctly. > > Sure. So? > > Cheers, > Bijan. > > -- Christine
Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2009 18:58:37 UTC