- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:36:35 -0500 (EST)
- To: ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk> Subject: Re: draft response for LC comment 26 (a and b) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:28:57 +0000 > Looks good to me modulo a typo that I fixed and modulo my wondering if > we shouldn't change "The OWL WG does not intend to make any changes in > response to this part of your message" to something *slightly* less > brusque, e.g., "The OWL WG has therefore decided not to make any changes > to the specification in response to this part of your message". Your > version is uncomfortably close to "I have no intention of doing X", > which to my ear sounds a bit confrontational. > > This last comment could be applied to several proposed responses. > > Ian I've softened wording accordingly in this a couple of other responses. peter
Received on Monday, 16 February 2009 14:36:55 UTC