- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:16:45 -0500 (EST)
- To: sandro@w3.org
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Quite nice. Quibble 1: With javascript turned off, I see all syntaxes (and the control panel stuff). Quibble 2: Displaying the control panels move the text up and down. I wonder if they could be floating when displayed, so that text wouldn't jump around so much. peter From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> Subject: multiple-syntax-examples Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:49:56 -0500 > > I saw everyone roll their eyes when the floating syntax controller was > mentioned, and I don't like it either, so I went ahead and implemented > something that I think is better. (I think it's the design Peter and > Bijan and I hashed out long ago, but no one felt like implementing. A > key design point is that it never makes the text jump, because the > check-box is always above the text being shown/hidden.) > > See this example: > > http://www.w3.org/2009/02/multisyntax-support/example-1.html > > It is now reasonably well-engineered. The shared javascript is in an > imported file; the configuration details are in the document, etc. > > I believe it makes the examples well-enough structured that automated > translation could be used, easily enough, probably to fill in any > (example,syntax) combinations that were not yet filled in. > > (I didn't actually change any of the wiki pages, yet.) > > -- Sandro > > >
Received on Saturday, 28 February 2009 20:16:45 UTC