- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:06:46 +0000
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk>, OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On 19 Feb 2009, at 09:54, Ivan Herman wrote: > Uli, > > I must admit I lost track of this issue after a while. However, the > Functional Syntax document does _not_ include any reference to the > Data > Range extension as being 'feature at risk'. Indeed, we decided that the "hook" part is *not* at risk, after a lot of contention! The rest may or may not be published as a *separate* recommendation or note. > As such, unless a major > change, I do not think that this feature would be added to the main > document, that would clearly go way beyond Last Call... Yes. > My recollection (and I may be wrong) is that [1] might be published > as a > separate WG note We haven't formally decided on the final disposition. > that can then be implemented, as an additional feature, > by OWL 2 tools. But that is a different statement. Yes. > Again, I may have missed something. I don't think so. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2009 10:03:14 UTC