- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 08:59:26 -0500 (EST)
- To: ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk
- Cc: msmith@clarkparsia.com, public-owl-wg@w3.org
I expect that this comment is more about the increased visibility and usability of the non-RDF syntaxes. Pointing out that RDF is still the primary syntax for exchange of OWL would probably be a good response. Of course, informal contact would probably be a good idea. peter From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk> Subject: Re: OWL2 and RDF Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:24:47 +0000 > > Thanks for that. I'm still not sure that I understood the point of the > comment, other than general grumbling/worries about OWL diverging from > RDF -- which is actually completely wrong as OWL2 still includes the > Full variant and even allows *more* RDF graphs to be treated as OWL DL. > > Does anyone think that they understand the statement that OWL2 "won't > use RDF itself"? Is this more confusion about the surface syntax? > Shouldn't we contact Taylor Cowan and ask for clarification? > > Ian > > > > On 2 Feb 2009, at 19:39, Mike Smith wrote: > > > > > A slightly longer version of this comment appeared on the jena-dev > > list and is archived at [1]. I believe it provides additional context > > that may be helpful in understanding the question and formulating a > > response. > > > > [1] http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/jena-dev/message/37828 > > > > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:35, Taylor Cowan <taylor_cowan@yahoo.com> > wrote: > >> > >> I'm a bit disappointed with owl2. Just stepping back, considering > the domain from the perspective of an internet technologist unfamiliar > with semantic web technologies, it's probably confusing that the > language used to order, model, or govern the semantic web (which is to > be composed of RDF in various manifestations, RDFa for example) won't > use RDF itself, and requires tooling to translate between itself and the > lowest common denominator of the sem web. > >> > >> I'm aware that the working group is composed of experts who know much > more about this stuff than I do, but I fear that OWL2 will dampen the > growth of the practical semantic web unless it's extremely complimentary > and supportive of RDF. > > > > --Mike Smith > > > > Clark & Parsia > > > >
Received on Monday, 9 February 2009 13:59:27 UTC