- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:57:57 -0800
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Cc: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
2009/2/3 Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>: > On 3 Feb 2009, at 20:15, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: > [snip] >> >> That there is a choice of labels is due to a request by Alan Rector. >> The motivation for a choice of language should be clear. > > Choice? I don't get this. The labels: keyword says which annotation property can be used for a quoted label. One might suggest that only rdfs:label be used for labels but Alan said he wants to be able to use other properties, for example skos:prefLabel Similarly, one might want to be able to choose that labels used in rendering to manchester syntax are ones in a particular language. > [snip] > >> Labels with highest precedence are associated with IRIs by being added >> to LabelToIRI. The order of precedence is: > > [snip] > > My instinct right there is to say, "non starter". > > I have no idea why there's an order of precedence for this feature. It seems like a very, very bad idea. Without a precedence ordering the mapping can be ambiguous. Even with it, it can, but less often. > > Cheers, > Bijan. >
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2009 23:58:34 UTC