- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:37:57 -0500
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
> Quite nice. > > Quibble 1: With javascript turned off, I see all syntaxes (and the > control panel stuff). What is displayed with javascript turned off is customizable -- whatever display settings you put in the HTML will (of course) not be affect by the (not-running) javascript. Author should probable put style="display:none;" on all syntaxes but the first, for this case. What control panel stuff do you see? The control panels are generated by the javascript. Can you send me a screen shot? > Quibble 2: Displaying the control panels move the text up and down. I > wonder if they could be floating when displayed, so that text wouldn't > jump around so much. By "floated" you mean put in a pop-up window, or displayed with css "float"? The latter would move text, too. We have to either (1) reserve screen space, (2) cover text, or (3) move some text down. A version of (2) with a moveable pop-up would be okay -- I'm not sure how to do it without running afoul of pop-up blockers, though. - s > peter > > > > > From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> > Subject: multiple-syntax-examples > Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:49:56 -0500 > > > > > I saw everyone roll their eyes when the floating syntax controller was > > mentioned, and I don't like it either, so I went ahead and implemented > > something that I think is better. (I think it's the design Peter and > > Bijan and I hashed out long ago, but no one felt like implementing. A > > key design point is that it never makes the text jump, because the > > check-box is always above the text being shown/hidden.) > > > > See this example: > > > > http://www.w3.org/2009/02/multisyntax-support/example-1.html > > > > It is now reasonably well-engineered. The shared javascript is in an > > imported file; the configuration details are in the document, etc. > > > > I believe it makes the examples well-enough structured that automated > > translation could be used, easily enough, probably to fill in any > > (example,syntax) combinations that were not yet filled in. > > > > (I didn't actually change any of the wiki pages, yet.) > > > > -- Sandro > > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 28 February 2009 20:38:05 UTC