- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:48:23 +0100
- To: Christine Golbreich <cgolbrei@gmail.com>
- CC: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <499E6047.1090908@w3.org>
Christine, Christine Golbreich wrote: > Thanks. > > All seems good. Howvere, I'm not sure that the second section "The > primary motivation of changing from the OWL 1 abstract syntax (AS) > ..." is needed in that response. Unless there is extra info that I > don't know or missed, AS vs FS was not expliciley raised in the 2 > quoted emails (1st or 2nd). I'd be inclined to remove it to remain > focused on their explicit content and not to extend our response to > that. > Frank explicitly raised that in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Feb/0014.html see point (b) at the end of the mail. My draft addresses both the original comment and this one, hence we have to answer this. > Nevertheless, since I believe it's highly relevant to document this > issue somewhere in our docs, we may add something similar in the > Syntax or/and in NF&R. I have added it in the new drafted section 3 > of NF&R [1]. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/New_Features_and_Rationale#Other_Design_Choices_and_Rationale > I will be a bit vaguer than that. That we will add something on this issue into the F&R is good to point out. But I would not want to refer explicitly to any URI yet, because the text therein may not be final yet and if Frank goes there _today_, it may raise more confusions. I had some extra discussion with Alan and Ian yesterday, I will prepare a slightly reworded version of the answer later today. Stay tuned. Thanks Ivan > > Christine > > 2009/2/19 Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>: >> After the discussion yesterday, here is my draft. (The wiki page has >> also been updated). >> >> Ivan >> >> ------------------------------- >> To: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl> >> CC: public-owl-comments@w3.org >> Subject: [LC response] To Frank van Harmelen >> >> Dear Frank, >> >> Thank you for your comment >> >> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jan/0037.html> >> on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts. >> >> We also note the 'addendum' to your original comment in >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Feb/0014.html >> >> And we thank you for helping us avoiding further confusion on this issue. >> >> Indeed, as you note in your second mail, the current Functional Syntax >> (FS) notation uses the _:x syntax to denote anonymous individuals. This >> is a consequence of the way the new, functional syntax works. >> >> The primary motivation of changing from the OWL 1 abstract syntax (AS) >> to the OWL 2 FS was that the FS is closer to the syntax used in first >> order logic, which makes various specification issues as well as >> relating OWL 2 abstract constructs to the general literature easier. As >> the primary role of the FS is to _define_ the structure of OWL 2 (and >> not necessarily to serve as a serialization syntax), the clarity of the >> syntax was an important factor for choosing it. >> >> As for the usability of AS in OWL 2: if used as an exchange syntax then, >> of course, OWL 1 ontologies written in AS may be input to OWL 2 tools >> and remain valid ontologies. But we must emphasize that this is an issue >> of the tool providers: the only _required_ exchange syntax for OWL 2 >> ontologies being RDF/XML, it is up to the tools to decide whether they >> would accept ontologies serialized in AS (or in FS, for that matter). >> >> We hope this answers your concerns on this particular issue >> >> Please acknowledge receipt of this email to >> <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should >> suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you >> are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment. >> >> Regards, >> Ivan Herman >> on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group >> >> -- >> >> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >> mobile: +31-641044153 >> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html >> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >> > > > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Friday, 20 February 2009 07:48:59 UTC