Re: Agenda TC 04/02/2009

Action 269 is not pending, it was said to be completed at last TC
(see also
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2009Jan/0167.html)

2009/2/3 Héctor Pérez-Urbina <hector.perez-urbina@comlab.ox.ac.uk>

>
> Hi,
>
> This is a preliminary version of this week's teleconf
>
>    *  Admin
>          o Roll call
>          o Agenda amendments?
>          o PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes (28 January)
>          o Action items status
>                + Pending Review Actions
>                      # Action 271 Talk to Alan about acting on action
> 247 or withdraw the comment... / Ian Horrocks
>                      # Action 276 Draft response/actions w.r.t. [5] /
> Bijan Parsia
>                      # Action 277 Draft response to JH1 / Bijan Parsia
>                + Due and overdue Actions
>                      # Action 247 Make a detailed proposal for edits
> to Manchester Syntax to address issue-146 / Alan Ruttenberg
>                      # Action 264 Talk to Tim Redmond about his lc
> comment / Alan Ruttenberg
>                      # Action 269 Mail Christine & Evan about
> resolution to JH1 / Alan Ruttenberg
>                      # Action 270 Add new examples in response to IH1
> / Boris Motik
>                      # Action 275 Track references to unicode 5 in
> the current drafts and propose changes needed to the conformance doc /
> Bijan Parsia
>                      # Action 273 Sift through Jeremy's / TQ email
> and web page to filter those aspects requiring further work / Ian
> Horrocks
>                      # Action 272 Produce a wiki page to consolidate
> new features/rationales from email responses that got mixed into LC
> comments / Christine Golbreich
>          o F2F5 (23-24 February, 2009)
>                + Will definitely go ahead
>                + Please add attendance status to People page
>    * Last Call Comments (see public-owl-comments and Responses to
> Last Call Comments)
>          o MS1 (RDF Mapping bug) -- ready for WG approval of technical
> change
>          o MD1 (Unicode) -- response drafted
>          o JH1 (Keys) -- response drafted
>          o TM1, FH3, BP2 (XML and GRDDL)
>          o FH2, SWD1 (Use of OWL/DL/Full)
>          o RIF1 (Disjoint numeric datatypes)
>          o RIF2 (Set of supported datatypes)
>          o FH4 (Treatment of anonymous individuals)
>          o BP1 (Axiom hiding)
>          o BP2 (Redesign XML syntax)
>          o JH2 (Wants nary datatype predicates)
>          o RM1 (Datatype properties should be functional)
>          o JR7 (Definition of imports closure)
>    * Test Cases
>          o Problems with approved test cases?
>          o Progress on tool support, e.g., for "species validation"?
>          o How to organize related tests - e.g. same input but
> different results for DL versus Full/RL (e.g. punning/sameas)
>          o How to handle webont test cases that need slight changes
>                + Comment on ontology header from Mike Smith (see Issue 135)
>          o PROPOSED: Approve some/all of the test cases currently in
> the test queue
>    * Plans for non-LC documents
>    * Coordination with RIF
>          o Organization
>          o LC comments on rdf:text
>          o Datatypes - Sandro update
>    * Features "At-Risk" (just a reminder)
>          o owl:rational support
>          o xsd:decimal precision
>          o owl:dateTime name
>          o rdf:XMLLiteral support
>          o OWL 2 RL Datatypes
>    * Additional other business
>    * RDF Semantics
>
> Regards,
>
> Héctor
>
>


-- 
Christine