- From: Jie Bao <baojie@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:37:32 -0500
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Cc: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>, W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
That's a fantastic tool! Maybe one more syntax to support: OWL 1 abstract syntax ? Swoop allows this syntax. Jie On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > > On 30 Jan 2009, at 20:47, Jim Hendler wrote: >> >> +1 - I must admit I was originally worried about all the syntax variants >> until I saw a document with all of them in it - made it clear these were >> very interoperable and was amazingly useful for cut/paste -- we should also >> do a Web site somewhere in W3C space that links to or does all the >> appropriate conversions - > > There's one hosted here: > http://owl.cs.manchester.ac.uk/converter/ > > This is the one that would be hosted in W3C space. So it's not just for XML > conversion. > > Note that it's already being used by the test cases: > http://www.w3.org/mid/200901211431.12300.mak@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de > see the example: > > http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/projects/owltests/index.php/Owl2-rl-rules > (Hmm. Gotta get the turtle in.) > > I think we can make the interface a bit nicer there. I favor a tab view. > > Note that this is the same code that drives Protege4. > >> I know Bijan has already mentioned the XML one, but all in one place would >> be a good way to show these really are just different presentations, and >> that's another way to help reduce some of the confusion (also, has anyone >> done an OWL to OWL2 "updater" - I know some parts of that would be hard, but >> a lot of the datatyping and such could be done easily, I'd think) > > The OWL API maintains all its historical parsers, so can consume OWL 1, to > OWL 1.1, to all the changes in OWL2. > > OWL 1 can be parsed entirely (afaik) by a vanilla OWL 2 parser. So it's > pretty peasy. A bit more fun woud be to have something that converted > patterns to new syntactic sugar (e.g., lots of disjointWiths into an > AllDisjoint). > > Cheers, > Bijan. > > -- Jie http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie
Received on Sunday, 1 February 2009 16:38:09 UTC