- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:14:16 +0000
- To: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: sattler@cs.man.ac.uk, public-owl-wg@w3.org
The table was pretty confusing because it was using ML1 in twice -- one for Maurizio and one for Marco. I fixed that, and added ML2 for this comment and response. Ian On 19 Feb 2009, at 19:28, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > With the fix (to 0048, by the way), this response looks fine. > > It should be put on the appropriate Wiki page and the LC responses > page > updated to "Response drafted". > > peter > > > From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: Draft response to LC comment 45 > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:12:02 -0500 > >> Hi Uli, >> >> The pointer to the comment isn't for this response. The message >> pointed to is about n-ary. >> -Alan >> >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Uli Sattler >> <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote: >>> Hi, here is a draft response to LC comment 45. Cheers, Uli >>> >>> ----------- >>> >>> Dear Marko, >>> >>> thank you for your comment >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jan/ >>> 0050.html on >>> the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts. >>> >>> We acknowledge the importance of implementations and tool support >>> and, >>> indeed, implementations supporting OWL 2 will be a condition for the >>> standardization of OWL 2. It is, however, not in the scope of >>> this working >>> group to standardize communications protocols [1]. >>> >>> On the other hand, we will publish a document of test cases [2] >>> and would >>> welcome help in the generation and testing of these cases. So, if >>> you think >>> that OWLlink would be a suitable tool for testing our test cases, >>> then it >>> would be great if you could coordinate with the working group, >>> for example >>> Markus Kroetzsch and Mike Smith. >>> >>> Please acknowledge receipt of this email to public-owl- >>> comments@w3.org >>> (replying to this email should suffice). In your acknowledgment >>> please let >>> us know whether or not you are satisfied with the working >>> group's response >>> to your comment. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Uli Sattler >>> on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group >>> >>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/06/OWLCharter.html >>> [2] >>> http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/projects/owltests/index.php/ >>> OWL_2_Test_Cases >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
Received on Friday, 20 February 2009 15:14:54 UTC