- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:30:28 +0000
- To: Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Looks good to me. Thanks. Ian On 18 Feb 2009, at 20:35, Uli Sattler wrote: > Hi, here is a draft response to LC comment 45. Cheers, Uli > > ----------- > > Dear Marko, > > thank you for your comment > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jan/ > 0050.html on > the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts. > > We acknowledge the importance of implementations and tool support > and, indeed, implementations supporting OWL 2 will be a condition > for the standardization of OWL 2. It is, however, not in the scope > of this working group to standardize communications protocols [1]. > > On the other hand, we will publish a document of test cases [2] and > would welcome help in the generation and testing of these cases. > So, if you think that OWLlink would be a suitable tool for testing > our test cases, then it would be great if you could coordinate with > the working group, for example Markus Kroetzsch and Mike Smith. > > Please acknowledge receipt of this email to public-owl- > comments@w3.org (replying to this email should suffice). In your > acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you are satisfied > with the working group's response to your comment. > > Regards, > Uli Sattler > on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/06/OWLCharter.html > [2] http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/projects/owltests/index.php/ > OWL_2_Test_Cases > > >
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2009 15:31:14 UTC