- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:28:25 +0000
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Nice job, ship it. On 20 Feb 2009, at 09:21, Ivan Herman wrote: > Based on the comments of Bijan and Christine on the list, and some > other > discussion with Ian and Alan, here is a slightly reworded version of > the > answer. > > I think the discussion on the rationale of choosing a new syntax (ie, > replacing the AS) was actually useful in improving our documents... > > Ivan > > ------------------------- > > Dear Frank, > > Thank you for your comment > > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jan/0037.html > > > on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts. > > We also note the 'addendum' to your original comment in > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Feb/0014.html Just a typo point...given how the archive wraps email, I find it helps to include long uris in angle brackets. There are mailers that will do the right thing with that. (Indeed, I wish the archive software would do the right thing :)) Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Friday, 20 February 2009 09:29:01 UTC