- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:12:02 -0500
- To: Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Hi Uli, The pointer to the comment isn't for this response. The message pointed to is about n-ary. -Alan On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi, here is a draft response to LC comment 45. Cheers, Uli > > ----------- > > Dear Marko, > > thank you for your comment > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jan/0050.html on > the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts. > > We acknowledge the importance of implementations and tool support and, > indeed, implementations supporting OWL 2 will be a condition for the > standardization of OWL 2. It is, however, not in the scope of this working > group to standardize communications protocols [1]. > > On the other hand, we will publish a document of test cases [2] and would > welcome help in the generation and testing of these cases. So, if you think > that OWLlink would be a suitable tool for testing our test cases, then it > would be great if you could coordinate with the working group, for example > Markus Kroetzsch and Mike Smith. > > Please acknowledge receipt of this email to public-owl-comments@w3.org > (replying to this email should suffice). In your acknowledgment please let > us know whether or not you are satisfied with the working group's response > to your comment. > > Regards, > Uli Sattler > on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/06/OWLCharter.html > [2] > http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/projects/owltests/index.php/OWL_2_Test_Cases > > > >
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:12:39 UTC