- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 06:31:13 -0500 (EST)
- To: alanruttenberg@gmail.com
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Proposal for use of labels in Manchester Syntax ISSUE-146, ACTION-247 Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 03:00:23 -0800 > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote: >> On 3 Feb 2009, at 23:57, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: >> >>> 2009/2/3 Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>: >>>> >>>> On 3 Feb 2009, at 20:15, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: >>>> [snip] >>>>> >>>>> That there is a choice of labels is due to a request by Alan Rector. >>>>> The motivation for a choice of language should be clear. >>>> >>>> Choice? I don't get this. >>> >>> The labels: keyword says which annotation property can be used for a >>> quoted label. One might suggest that only rdfs:label be used for >>> labels but Alan said he wants to be able to use other properties, for >>> example skos:prefLabel >>> >>> Similarly, one might want to be able to choose that labels used in >>> rendering to manchester syntax are ones in a particular language. >> >> This all seems to be tool level rather than language level. Why put this in >> the format? > > I honestly don't see the point of the format without this. Hmm. Given that the format is already in use, I don't see how this point of view can be sustained. > -Alan peter
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2009 11:41:53 UTC