Re: Draft response to LC comment 45

With the fix (to 0048, by the way), this response looks fine.

It should be put on the appropriate Wiki page and the LC responses page
updated to "Response drafted".

peter


From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Draft response to LC comment 45
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:12:02 -0500

> Hi Uli,
> 
> The pointer to the comment isn't for this response. The message
> pointed to is about n-ary.
> -Alan
> 
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote:
>> Hi, here is a draft response  to LC comment 45. Cheers, Uli
>>
>> -----------
>>
>> Dear Marko,
>>
>> thank you for your comment
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jan/0050.html on
>> the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.
>>
>> We acknowledge the importance of implementations and tool support and,
>> indeed, implementations supporting OWL 2 will be a condition for the
>> standardization of OWL 2. It is, however, not in the scope of this working
>> group to standardize communications protocols [1].
>>
>> On the other hand, we will publish a document of test cases [2] and would
>> welcome help in the generation and testing of these cases. So, if you think
>> that OWLlink would be a suitable tool for testing our test cases, then it
>> would be great if you could coordinate with the working group, for example
>> Markus Kroetzsch and Mike Smith.
>>
>> Please acknowledge receipt of this email to public-owl-comments@w3.org
>> (replying to this email should suffice). In your acknowledgment please let
>> us know whether or not you are satisfied  with the working group's response
>> to your comment.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Uli Sattler
>> on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/06/OWLCharter.html
>> [2]
>> http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/projects/owltests/index.php/OWL_2_Test_Cases
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Received on Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:28:15 UTC