public-owl-wg@w3.org from February 2009 by date

Saturday, 28 February 2009

• Re: comment on answer to comment... (OW/XML) Bijan Parsia
• Re: multiple-syntax-examples Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: multiple-syntax-examples Sandro Hawke
• Re: comment on answer to comment... (OW/XML) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: multiple-syntax-examples Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: comment on answer to comment... (OW/XML) Bijan Parsia
• Re: comment on answer to comment... (OW/XML) Alan Ruttenberg

Friday, 27 February 2009

• RE: multiple-syntax-examples Michael Schneider
• multiple-syntax-examples Sandro Hawke
• New topics for NF&R Christine Golbreich

Thursday, 26 February 2009

• ACTION-288 Completed (in a different way) Bijan Parsia
• Re: question on schedule Ivan Herman
• question on schedule Christine Golbreich
• Re: Draft for the response to LC comment 58 (fully typed functional-style syntax) Antoine Zimmermann
• comment on answer to comment... (OW/XML) Ivan Herman
• Re: Other GRDDL concerns which should not be lost Bijan Parsia
• Other GRDDL concerns which should not be lost Bijan Parsia

Wednesday, 25 February 2009

• Re: draft response for 41 / BP3 (discussed in last TC) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: draft response for 41 / BP3 (discussed in last TC) Michael Schneider
• Re: Last call comment - conformance/datatype map Bijan Parsia
• Re: draft response for 41 / BP3 (discussed in last TC) Bijan Parsia
• Re: draft response for 41 / BP3 (discussed in last TC) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Last call comment - conformance/datatype map Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: Implemented Resolution on LC-Comment 16 ("lexical value") in RDF-Based Semantics Michael Schneider
• RE: draft response for 41 / BP3 (discussed in last TC) Michael Schneider
• Re: draft response for 47 / MK1 (discussed in F2F5) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• approving responses to LC comments Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Implemented Resolution on LC-Comment 16 ("lexical value") in RDF-Based Semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: draft response for 47 / MK1 (discussed in F2F5) Ivan Herman
• draft response for 47 / MK1 (discussed in F2F5) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• draft response for 41 / BP3 (discussed in last TC) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• draft response for 39 / BP1 (discussed in last TC) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Draft Response to LC comment 42/AS1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Simpler editing of wiki tables Ivan Herman
• Draft Response to LC comment 42/AS1 Ivan Herman
• Re: Last call comment - conformance/datatype map Bijan Parsia
• Re: Last call comment - conformance/datatype map Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: Last call comment - conformance/datatype map Michael Schneider
• Implemented Resolution of LC Comment 34 (TQ) on property chains in RDF-Based Semantics Michael Schneider
• Implemented Resolution on LC-Comment 16 ("lexical value") in RDF-Based Semantics Michael Schneider

Tuesday, 24 February 2009

• Draft for the response to LC comment 58 (fully typed functional-style syntax) Boris Motik
• Re: Throw it away! Christine Golbreich
• Re: Throw it away! Bijan Parsia
• Re: Throw it away! Christine Golbreich
• Re: Throw it away! Bijan Parsia
• Re: Throw it away! Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Throw it away! Alan Ruttenberg
• Throw it away! Christine Golbreich
• draft response for LC comment 25 RIF2 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Last call comment - conformance/datatype map Bijan Parsia
• draft response for 43b ZW3b Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Last call comment - conformance/datatype map Alan Ruttenberg
• response for LC comment 23 JR1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: draft response for LC comment 32 CO1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Draft response to LC comment 46 Uli Sattler
• Re: [LC Response] To Michael Smith (was Re: The definition of entailment in the Direct Semantics document) Michael Smith
• [LC Response] To Michael Smith (was Re: The definition of entailment in the Direct Semantics document) Michael Smith
• Re: Last call comment - conformance/datatype map Bijan Parsia
• Last call comment - conformance/datatype map Alan Ruttenberg

Monday, 23 February 2009

• Re: draft response to LC comment 56/57, TC1, Taylor Cowan Ivan Herman
• Simpler editing of wiki tables Markus Krötzsch
• Re: draft response for LC comment 32 CO1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Availability Bijan Parsia
• Re: abstract preamble and "guide to documents" (LCC 10, ...) Christine Golbreich
• Agenda Amendment: JH1 Bijan Parsia
• Re: Draft response to LC comment 15 Bijan Parsia
• Re: Draft response to LC comment 15 Ivan Herman
• Re: abstract preamble and "guide to documents" (LCC 10, ...) Ivan Herman
• Re: Agenda TC 18/02/2009 Bijan Parsia
• Re: Agenda TC 18/02/2009 Bijan Parsia
• Re: Agenda TC 18/02/2009 Christine Golbreich
• Re: draft response for LC comment 32 CO1 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: draft response for LC comment 32 CO1 Antoine Zimmermann
• RE: Draft response to LC comment 15 Michael Schneider
• Syntactic Conformance: "OWL 2 DL Ontology Document": sufficient definition? Michael Schneider

Sunday, 22 February 2009

• Re: abstract preamble and "guide to documents" (LCC 10, ...) Christine Golbreich
• Remote Participation at OWL F2F Sandro Hawke
• Re: abstract preamble and "guide to documents" (LCC 10, ...) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: abstract preamble and "guide to documents" (LCC 10, ...) Ivan Herman

Saturday, 21 February 2009

• abstract preamble and "guide to documents" (LCC 10, ...) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: draft response for LC comment 16 (lexical value) Michael Schneider
• Re: draft response for LC comment 16 (lexical value) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: draft response for LC comment 16 (lexical value) Michael Schneider
• Re: State of the RDF-Based Semantics document Ian Horrocks
• Re: draft response for LC comment 16 (lexical value) Ian Horrocks
• Re: State of the RDF-Based Semantics document Ivan Herman
• Re: draft response to LC comment 56/57, TC1, Taylor Cowan Bijan Parsia
• Re: draft response to LC comment 56/57, TC1, Taylor Cowan Ivan Herman
• draft response for LC comment 16 (lexical value) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• State of the RDF-Based Semantics document Michael Schneider
• Re: 3rd Draft response to LC comment 30 (FH4) Ian Horrocks
• Re: draft response to LC comment 56/57, TC1, Taylor Cowan Ian Horrocks
• Re: draft response to LC comment 56/57, TC1, Taylor Cowan Bijan Parsia
• draft response to LC comment 56/57, TC1, Taylor Cowan Ivan Herman
• Re: 3rd Draft response to LC comment 30 (FH4) Ivan Herman

Friday, 20 February 2009

• Re: 3rd Draft response to LC comment 30 (FH4) Ian Horrocks
• Re: 3rd Draft response to LC comment 30 (FH4) Ivan Herman
• Re: draft response for LC comment 51 RM1 and 62 JM1 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: [LC response] To Zhe Wu Re: OWL 2 LC Comments Zhe Wu
• RE: draft response for LC comment 51 RM1 and 62 JM1 Michael Schneider
• Re: Draft response to LC comment 45 Ian Horrocks
• Re: draft response for LC comment 51 RM1 and 62 JM1 Ivan Herman
• Re: draft response for LC comment 51 RM1 and 62 JM1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• 13th European Conference on Digital Libraries - Final Call for Tutorials, Workshops and Panels Giannis Tsakonas
• Re: 3rd Draft response to LC comment 30 (FH4) Ian Horrocks
• Re: 3rd Draft response to LC comment 30 (FH4) Ivan Herman
• Re: 3rd Draft response to LC comment 30 (FH4) Ian Horrocks
• RE: 3rd Draft response to LC comment 30 (FH4) Michael Schneider
• Re: draft response for LC comment 62 JM1 Ivan Herman
• Re: draft response for LC comment 32 CO1 Ivan Herman
• Re: draft response for LC comment 62 JM1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: draft response for LC comment 32 CO1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: 3rd Draft response to LC comment 30 (FH4) Bijan Parsia
• Re: 2nd Draft response to LC comment 30 (FH4) Christine Golbreich
• 3rd Draft response to LC comment 30 (FH4) Ivan Herman
• Re: draft response for LC comment 62 JM1 Ivan Herman
• Re: draft response for LC comment 32 CO1 Ivan Herman
• No teleconf next week (25th Feb) Ian Horrocks
• Re: A proposal for addressing LC comment 58 (fully typed functional-style syntax) Christine Golbreich
• Re: 2nd Draft response to LC comment 30 (FH4) Ivan Herman

Thursday, 19 February 2009

• RE: A proposal for addressing LC comment 58 (fully typed functional-style syntax) Michael Schneider
• RE: A proposal for addressing LC comment 58 (fully typed functional-style syntax) Michael Schneider
• possible responses for LC Comment 23 JR1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• partial response for LC comment 21 JDB2 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• draft response for LC comment 62 JM1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• draft response for LC comment 32 CO1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: 2nd Draft response to LC comment 30 (FH4) Christine Golbreich
• Update on NF&R Christine Golbreich
• Re: [LC response] To Jim Hendler (was Re: Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments) Bijan Parsia
• Re: [LC response] To Jim Hendler (was Re: Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments) Jim Hendler
• A proposal for addressing LC comment 58 (fully typed functional-style syntax) Boris Motik
• Re: 2nd Draft response to LC comment 30 (FH4) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Draft response to LC comment 15 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Draft response to LC comment 45 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Draft response to LC comment 38 (editorial) Bijan Parsia
• Re: Draft response to LC comment 38 (editorial) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Draft response to LC comment 45 Alan Ruttenberg
• [LC response] To Zhe Wu Re: OWL 2 LC Comments Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Draft response to LC comment 46 Uli Sattler
• Re: [LC response] To Jim Hendler (was Re: Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments) Bijan Parsia
• Re: Draft response to LC comment 46 Ian Horrocks
• Re: Draft response to LC comment 15 Ian Horrocks
• Re: Draft response to LC comment 45 Ian Horrocks
• Re: Print out of Functional-style syntax has tiny fonts. Zhe Wu
• Re: Draft response to LC comment 38 (editorial) Ian Horrocks
• Re: Print out of Functional-style syntax has tiny fonts. Ian Horrocks
• Re: [LC response] To Jim Hendler (was Re: Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments) Jim Hendler
• Re: 2nd Draft response to LC comment 30 (FH4) Bijan Parsia
• Re: Draft response to LC comment 46 Bijan Parsia
• Re: [LC response] To Jim Hendler (was Re: Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments) Bijan Parsia
• Re: Draft response to LC comment 46 Ivan Herman
• 2nd Draft response to LC comment 30 (FH4) Ivan Herman
• 13th European Conference on Digital Libraries - Calls for Special Tracks Giannis Tsakonas
• Re: Alan Ruttenberg: Re: notes from OWL and RIF datatype coordination meeting Chris Welty

Wednesday, 18 February 2009

• Re: Draft response to LC comment 15 Antoine Zimmermann
• Draft response to LC comment 45 Uli Sattler
• Draft response to LC comment 46 Uli Sattler
• Draft response to LC comment 15 Boris Motik
• Re: ACTION-264: Discuss imports with Tim Redmond. Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-264: Discuss imports with Tim Redmond. Timothy Redmond
• Draft response to LC comment 38 (editorial) Boris Motik
• Re: Print out of Functional-style syntax has tiny fonts. Zhe Wu
• Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ACTION-278 (Unicode reference in rdf:text) Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-278 (Unicode reference in rdf:text) Bijan Parsia
• (second) draft response for LC comment 14 Mike Smith
• Re: Print out of Functional-style syntax has tiny fonts. Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Alan Ruttenberg: Re: notes from OWL and RIF datatype coordination meeting Bijan Parsia
• Re: draft response for LC comment 14 Mike Smith
• Re: Alan Ruttenberg: Re: notes from OWL and RIF datatype coordination meeting Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: TR1 Ian Horrocks
• Re: TR1 Bijan Parsia
• Re: TR1 Ian Horrocks
• Re: Alan Ruttenberg: Re: notes from OWL and RIF datatype coordination meeting Bijan Parsia
• Re: Alan Ruttenberg: Re: notes from OWL and RIF datatype coordination meeting Alan Ruttenberg

Tuesday, 17 February 2009

• TR1 Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-264: Discuss imports with Tim Redmond. Timothy Redmond
• Re: ACTION-264: Discuss imports with Tim Redmond. Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-264: Discuss imports with Tim Redmond. Timothy Redmond
• Re: Agenda TC 18/02/2009 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Agenda TC 18/02/2009 Héctor Pérez-Urbina
• Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled Ian Horrocks
• Re: References templates Ian Horrocks
• Re: Profiles again (was Re: draft response for LC comment 26 (a and b) ) Ian Horrocks
• ACTION-287: Draft of WG response to LC-Comment 51 / #1 (functional data properties) Michael Schneider
• Re: draft response for LC comment 50 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ACTION-264: Discuss imports with Tim Redmond. Bijan Parsia
• Re: draft response for LC comment 50 Ian Horrocks
• Profiles again (was Re: draft response for LC comment 26 (a and b) ) Jim Hendler
• Drafting responses to LC comments. Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: draft response for LC comment 26 (a and b) Sandro Hawke
• Re: draft response for LC comment 26 (a and b) Jim Hendler
• Re: draft response for LC comment 26 (a and b) Sandro Hawke

Monday, 16 February 2009

• Re: draft response for LC comment 26 (a and b) Jim Hendler
• draft response for LC comment 14 Mike Smith
• Re: ACTION-264: Discuss imports with Tim Redmond. Timothy Redmond
• Re: ACTION-264: Discuss imports with Tim Redmond. Timothy Redmond
• Re: notes from OWL and RIF datatype coordination meeting Bijan Parsia
• Re: notes from OWL and RIF datatype coordination meeting Ivan Herman
• References templates Michael Schneider
• Re: draft response for LC comment 26 (a and b) Christine Golbreich
• Re: draft response for LC comment 26 (a and b) Christine Golbreich
• RE: draft response for LC comment 53 Michael Schneider
• Re: draft response for LC comment 26 (a and b) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: draft response for LC comment 26 (a and b) Ian Horrocks
• Re: draft response for LC comment 53 Ian Horrocks
• Re: ACTION-264: Discuss imports with Tim Redmond. Ian Horrocks
• Re: draft response for LC comment 26 (a and b) Bijan Parsia
• Introduction Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: draft response for LC comment 26 (a and b) Ivan Herman

Sunday, 15 February 2009

• Re: draft response for LC comment 26 (a and b) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: draft response for LC comment 26 (a and b) Christine Golbreich
• Re: DRAFT response to comment #54, Jan Wielemaker Bijan Parsia
• Re: DRAFT response to comment #54, Jan Wielemaker Ivan Herman
• Re: DRAFT response to comment #54, Jan Wielemaker Bijan Parsia
• Re: DRAFT response to comment #54, Jan Wielemaker Ivan Herman
• Re: draft response for LC comment 31 Ivan Herman
• Re: draft response for LC comment 26 (a and b) Ivan Herman

Saturday, 14 February 2009

• Re: proposed response to LC comment 55 Ian Horrocks
• Re: ACTION-278 (Unicode reference in rdf:text) Ian Horrocks
• Re: DRAFT response to comment #54, Jan Wielemaker Ian Horrocks
• Re: DRAFT response to comment #54, Jan Wielemaker Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: proposed response to LC comment 43 sections 2,5,6 Ian Horrocks
• Re: ACTION-275: Unicode, XML, RDF references Ian Horrocks
• Re: notes from OWL and RIF datatype coordination meeting Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: draft response for LC comment 26 (a and b) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: draft response for LC comment 31 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: notes from OWL and RIF datatype coordination meeting Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: draft response for LC comment 31 Bijan Parsia
• Re: draft response for LC comment 31 Ivan Herman
• Re: draft response for LC comment 31 Bijan Parsia
• Re: draft response for LC comment 31 Ivan Herman
• Re: draft response for LC comment 26 (a and b) Ivan Herman
• draft response for LC comment 31 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• draft response for LC comment 50 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• draft response for LC comment 26 (a and b) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ACTION-264: Discuss imports with Tim Redmond. Timothy Redmond

Friday, 13 February 2009

• Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled Alan Ruttenberg
• draft response for LC comment 53 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ACTION-264: Discuss imports with Tim Redmond. Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled Bijan Parsia
• Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled Bijan Parsia
• Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled Alan Ruttenberg

Thursday, 12 February 2009

• Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled Bijan Parsia
• Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled Bijan Parsia
• Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled Sandro Hawke
• What happens when an ontology has data literals that are outside the range handled Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ACTION-264: Discuss imports with Tim Redmond. Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-264: Discuss imports with Tim Redmond. Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ACTION-264: Discuss imports with Tim Redmond. Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• ACTION-264: Discuss imports with Tim Redmond. Alan Ruttenberg
• proposed response to LC comment 7 Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Wednesday, 11 February 2009

• ACTION-278 (Unicode reference in rdf:text) Jie Bao
• Re: DRAFT response to comment #54, Jan Wielemaker Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: proposed response to LC comment 43 sections 2,5,6 Michael Schneider
• Re: LC comment: sameAs in OWL QL Ivan Herman
• DRAFT response to comment #54, Jan Wielemaker Ivan Herman
• F2F agenda Ian Horrocks

Tuesday, 10 February 2009

• proposed response to LC comment 55 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: ACTION-275: Unicode, XML, RDF references Michael Schneider
• proposed response to LC comment 43 sections 2,5,6 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• W3C Membership Survey Sandro Hawke
• OWL WG Héctor Pérez-Urbina

Monday, 9 February 2009

• Re: Comments on NF&R Bijan Parsia
• Re: Comments on NF&R Christine Golbreich
• Re: Comments on NF&R Bijan Parsia
• Re: Comments on NF&R Christine Golbreich
• XML Schema last call documents and ACTION-252 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Comments on NF&R Bijan Parsia
• Comments on NF&R Christine Golbreich
• Dealing with LC comments Ian Horrocks
• Re: XML Schema 1.1 LCWD Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ACTION-275: Unicode, XML, RDF references Ian Horrocks
• XML Schema 1.1 LCWD Sandro Hawke
• Re: OWL2 and RDF Ivan Herman
• Re: ACTION-275: Unicode, XML, RDF references Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-275: Unicode, XML, RDF references Ian Horrocks
• Re: notes from OWL and RIF datatype coordination meeting Bijan Parsia
• notes from OWL and RIF datatype coordination meeting Sandro Hawke
• Minutes of 2009-01-04 teleconf Ian Horrocks
• Re: ACTION-275: Unicode, XML, RDF references Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Naming issues Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OWL2 and RDF Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Naming issues Michael Schneider
• Re: ACTION-275: Unicode, XML, RDF references Ian Horrocks
• Re: LC comment: sameAs in OWL QL Ian Horrocks
• Fwd: Naming issues Ian Horrocks
• Re: OWL2 and RDF Ian Horrocks
• Re: ACTION-268 Ian Horrocks
• OWL+RIF coordination meeting on datatypes Sandro Hawke

Friday, 6 February 2009

• 13th European Conference on Digital Libraries - Call for Tutorials, Workshops, DC papers, Panels Giannis Tsakonas

Thursday, 5 February 2009

• OWL 2 profile checker Ian Horrocks
• Re: ACTION-280 completed Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-280 completed Ivan Herman
• Re: ACTION-280 completed Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-280 completed Ivan Herman
• RE: ACTION-275: Unicode, XML, RDF references Michael Schneider
• Re: ACTION-275: Unicode, XML, RDF references Bijan Parsia
• RE: ACTION-275: Unicode, XML, RDF references Michael Schneider
• Re: ACTION-275: Unicode, XML, RDF references Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-280 completed Bijan Parsia

Wednesday, 4 February 2009

• Re: draft for JH1 (keys) Bijan Parsia
• ACTION-280 completed Bijan Parsia
• draft for JH1 (keys) Christine Golbreich
• Re: Agenda TC 04/02/2009 Christine Golbreich
• Re: LC comment: sameAs in OWL QL Mike Smith
• Re: Proposal for use of labels in Manchester Syntax ISSUE-146, ACTION-247 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposal for use of labels in Manchester Syntax ISSUE-146, ACTION-247 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposal for use of labels in Manchester Syntax ISSUE-146, ACTION-247 Bijan Parsia
• Re: Proposal for use of labels in Manchester Syntax ISSUE-146, ACTION-247 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Proposal for use of labels in Manchester Syntax ISSUE-146, ACTION-247 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: ACTION-275: Unicode, XML, RDF references Michael Schneider
• Re: Proposal for use of labels in Manchester Syntax ISSUE-146, ACTION-247 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Proposal for use of labels in Manchester Syntax ISSUE-146, ACTION-247 Bijan Parsia
• ACTION-275: Unicode, XML, RDF references Bijan Parsia

Tuesday, 3 February 2009

• Re: Proposal for use of labels in Manchester Syntax ISSUE-146, ACTION-247 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Proposal for use of labels in Manchester Syntax ISSUE-146, ACTION-247 Bijan Parsia
• Proposal for use of labels in Manchester Syntax ISSUE-146, ACTION-247 Alan Ruttenberg
• Agenda TC 04/02/2009 Héctor Pérez-Urbina
• LC comment: sameAs in OWL QL Ivan Herman
• Naming issues Ian Horrocks

Monday, 2 February 2009

• Re: OWL2 and RDF Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: OWL2 and RDF Mike Smith

Sunday, 1 February 2009

• Re: Proposal for multiple syntaxes everywhere Bijan Parsia
• Re: Proposal for multiple syntaxes everywhere Jie Bao
• Re: Proposal for multiple syntaxes everywhere Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Proposal for multiple syntaxes everywhere Ivan Herman

Last message date: Saturday, 28 February 2009 20:42:10 UTC