Re: draft response for LC comment 16 (lexical value)

• From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
• Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:01:15 -0500 (EST)
• To: schneid@fzi.de
• Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
• Message-Id: <20090221.080115.32128979.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

From: "Michael Schneider" <schneid@fzi.de>
Subject: RE: draft response for LC comment 16 (lexical value)
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:54:10 +0100

> Actually, my comment was more about consistency with /OWL 1/ and RDF. 

OK, I'll add that, but the main reason for the change is consistency
with the continuing RDF and XML documents, not the soon-to-be-superseded
OWL 1 documents. 

> and "... RDF-Based Semantics".

That's up to you, and not part of the LC comment.

>>The working group views this as an editorial change.

peter

Received on Saturday, 21 February 2009 13:01:40 UTC