- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 12:42:29 -0500 (EST)
- To: sandro@w3.org
- Cc: public-rif-wg@w3.org, public-owl-wg@w3.org
From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> Subject: XML Schema 1.1 LCWD Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 12:21:48 -0500 > I hadn't noticed until today that XML Schema 1.1 was currently in Last > Call. I wonder why we didn't get an explicit heads-up. > I think both RIF and OWL ought to review at least > > W3C XML Schema Definition Language (XSD) 1.1 Part 2: Datatypes > http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/ > > to make sure they say what we want them to say. For instance, it > includes this change: > > At the suggestion of the W3C OWL Working Group, a explicitTimezone > facet has been added to allow date/time datatypes to be restricted > by requiring or forbidding an explicit time zone offset from UTC, > instead of making it optional. The dateTimeStamp datatype has been > defined using this facet. This is as expected and I believe that it is fine for us. The OWL WG should probably send in a LC comment to the effect that we are happy with this. > The draft says the comment deadline is Feb 20, but it was just extended > to March 2 [1]. > > -- Sandro > > [1] W3C member-access e-mail > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2009JanMar/0031.html > peter
Received on Monday, 9 February 2009 17:42:20 UTC