- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:48:50 +0000
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Works for me. Thanks, Ian On 21 Feb 2009, at 12:10, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > [Draft Response for LC Comment 16] MS6 > > To: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de> > CC: public-owl-comments@w3.org > Subject: [LC response] To Michael Schneider > > Dear Michael, > > Thank you for your comment > > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/ > 2009Jan/0007.html> > > on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts. > > Thanks for pointing the divergence between the nomenclature in the > OWL 2 > documents and that used previously. We have moved from lexical > value to > lexical form to be consistent with XML Schema datatypes and RDF. > > The diffs can be found at > ... Syntax > ... Direct Semantics > > The working group views this as an editorial change. > > Please acknowledge receipt of this email to > <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should > suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you > are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment. > > Regards, > Peter F. Patel-Schneider > on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group >
Received on Saturday, 21 February 2009 12:49:28 UTC