- From: Christine Golbreich <cgolbrei@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:31:35 +0100
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, Ian Horrocks <ianh@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To owners of recent responses and all, Seems that no list of new topics for the NF&R has been drawn at runtime at the F2F :(. Thus we are now faced to the rather time consuming and boring task of tracking issues to be added into NF&R, from the Minutes and the Responses to LC. I have made a first lexical search on the 74 pages of the Minutes, for "NF&R" or "feature", from which I glanned the topics - SelfRestrictions vs Global restrictions (motivation) - OWL/XML (small text) Without context, semantics, and all being not explicitely scribed in IRC, I'm not sure to be exhaustive. Note that since NF&R was already extended before the F2F with a section 3 some topics are already there: 3.1 Functional Syntax 3.2 Normative syntax 3.3 Backward compatibility with RDF 3.4 Surface Differences 3.4.1 Anonymous Individuals 3.4.2 Inverse Property Expressions 1) Therefore, in case I missed it, may owners of responses who point to the NF&R, please send me now a note saying what is the missing topic agreed at F2F to be added into the NF&R (or anyone who finds a missing feature), ? 2) Regarding SelfRestrictions vs Global restrictions, can anyone provide a real UC to replace UC#3 ? on IRC record: alanr: Local reflexivity is more useful than the global reflexivity ianh: SO we can strenghten the response by saying that local reflexivity is more useful than the global one However, we don't have UCs for Selfrestriction together with a concrete example from a real application real (as required for all other features) quoted in the references. The example initially proposed by Michel was finally criticized saying it does not illustrate Self. Thanks -- Christine
Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 17:32:12 UTC