public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org from July 2016 by thread

MATF Minutes 28 July 2016 Kim Patch (Thursday, 28 July)

Small PR on Mobile-A11y-TF-Note Patrick H. Lauke (Wednesday, 27 July)

Proposed new Customizationof shortcut SCs to reduce risk of accidental voice activation David MacDonald (Thursday, 21 July)

• RE: Proposed new Customizationof shortcut SCs to reduce risk of accidental voice activation Jonathan Avila (Thursday, 21 July)
  • Re: Proposed new Customizationof shortcut SCs to reduce risk of accidental voice activation Kim Patch (Thursday, 21 July)
• Re: Proposed new Customizationof shortcut SCs to reduce risk of accidental voice activation Kim Patch (Thursday, 21 July)
  • Re: Proposed new Customizationof shortcut SCs to reduce risk of accidental voice activation David MacDonald (Thursday, 21 July)
    • Re: Proposed new Customizationof shortcut SCs to reduce risk of accidental voice activation Patrick H. Lauke (Thursday, 21 July)
      • Re: Proposed new Customizationof shortcut SCs to reduce risk of accidental voice activation David MacDonald (Thursday, 21 July)
        • Re: Proposed new Customizationof shortcut SCs to reduce risk of accidental voice activation Kim Patch (Thursday, 21 July)
          • Re: Proposed new Customizationof shortcut SCs to reduce risk of accidental voice activation Patrick H. Lauke (Thursday, 21 July)
          • Re: Proposed new Customizationof shortcut SCs to reduce risk of accidental voice activation David MacDonald (Thursday, 21 July)
    • Re: Proposed new Customizationof shortcut SCs to reduce risk of accidental voice activation Kim Patch (Thursday, 21 July)
• Re: Proposed new Customizationof shortcut SCs to reduce risk of accidental voice activation David MacDonald (Sunday, 24 July)
  • Re: Proposed new Customizationof shortcut SCs to reduce risk of accidental voice activation Jeanne Spellman (Thursday, 28 July)
    • Re: Proposed new Customizationof shortcut SCs to reduce risk of accidental voice activation Jeanne Spellman (Thursday, 28 July)
      • Re: Proposed new Customizationof shortcut SCs to reduce risk of accidental voice activation David MacDonald (Thursday, 28 July)
      • Re: Proposed new Customizationof shortcut SCs to reduce risk of accidental voice activation John Foliot (Thursday, 28 July)

MATF Minutes 21 July 2016 Kim Patch (Thursday, 21 July)

Re: ACTION-55: Update github version http://w3c.github.io/mobile-a11y-extension/ to include pointer, add definition of coarse/fine etc as per mq lvl 4 etc (Mobile Accessibility Task Force) Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 18 July)

Summary of 2.1 discussion an attempt at consensus David MacDonald (Saturday, 16 July)

• Re: Summary of 2.1 discussion an attempt at consensus Gregg Vanderheiden (Sunday, 17 July)
• Re: Summary of 2.1 discussion an attempt at consensus Patrick H. Lauke (Sunday, 17 July)

Minor tweak/correction to 2.5.1 Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 15 July)

• Re: Minor tweak/correction to 2.5.1 David MacDonald (Friday, 15 July)

Re: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? David MacDonald (Thursday, 14 July)

Regrets for this week's call Patrick H. Lauke (Thursday, 14 July)

• Re: Regrets for this week's call Patrick H. Lauke (Thursday, 14 July)
  • RE: Regrets for this week's call Kathy Wahlbin (Thursday, 14 July)
    • Re: Regrets for this week's call Alistair Garrison (Thursday, 14 July)
• Re: Regrets for this week's call Detlev Fischer (Thursday, 14 July)

FW: [WebAIM] Color of link text Jonathan Avila (Sunday, 10 July)

• Re: FW: [WebAIM] Color of link text Patrick H. Lauke (Sunday, 10 July)
  • Re: FW: [WebAIM] Color of link text Patrick H. Lauke (Sunday, 10 July)
    • Re: FW: [WebAIM] Color of link text Patrick H. Lauke (Sunday, 10 July)
  • Re: [WebAIM] Color of link text Gregg Vanderheiden (Sunday, 10 July)
    • Re: [WebAIM] Color of link text Patrick H. Lauke (Sunday, 10 July)
      • Re: [WebAIM] Color of link text Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 11 July)
        • Re: [WebAIM] Color of link text David MacDonald (Monday, 11 July)
          • Re: [WebAIM] Color of link text Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 11 July)
            • Re: [WebAIM] Color of link text David MacDonald (Monday, 11 July)
    • Re: [WebAIM] Color of link text Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 11 July)
      • Re: [WebAIM] Color of link text David MacDonald (Monday, 11 July)
        • Re: [WebAIM] Color of link text Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 11 July)

MATF Minutes 7 July 2016 Kim Patch (Thursday, 7 July)

Mobile Accessibility Taskforce Agenda Kathy Wahlbin (Tuesday, 5 July)

• [regrets] Re: Mobile Accessibility Taskforce Agenda Shadi Abou-Zahra (Tuesday, 5 July)
• RE: Mobile Accessibility Taskforce Agenda ALAN SMITH (Tuesday, 5 July)
  • Re: Mobile Accessibility Taskforce Agenda Marc Johlic (Wednesday, 6 July)
    • Re: Mobile Accessibility Taskforce Agenda Henny Swan (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: Mobile Accessibility Taskforce Agenda Jeanne Spellman (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: Mobile Accessibility Taskforce Agenda Patrick H. Lauke (Thursday, 7 July)
  • RE: Mobile Accessibility Taskforce Agenda Kathy Wahlbin (Thursday, 7 July)
• Mobile Accessibility Taskforce Agenda Kathy Wahlbin (Monday, 18 July)
  • Re: Mobile Accessibility Taskforce Agenda Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 18 July)
    • Re: Mobile Accessibility Taskforce Agenda David MacDonald (Tuesday, 19 July)
    • Re: Mobile Accessibility Taskforce Agenda Patrick H. Lauke (Thursday, 21 July)
      • Re: Mobile Accessibility Taskforce Agenda Marc Johlic (Thursday, 21 July)
  • Re: Mobile Accessibility Taskforce Agenda Alistair Garrison (Thursday, 21 July)
  • Mobile Accessibility Taskforce Agenda Kathy Wahlbin (Tuesday, 26 July)
    • Re: Mobile Accessibility Taskforce Agenda Patrick H. Lauke (Wednesday, 27 July)

Should we require all functionality to be operable with pointer? David MacDonald (Monday, 4 July)

• Re: Should we require all functionality to be operable with pointer? Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 4 July)
  • Re: Should we require all functionality to be operable with pointer? David MacDonald (Monday, 4 July)
    • Re: Should we require all functionality to be operable with pointer? Gregg Vanderheiden (Monday, 4 July)
      • Re: Should we require all functionality to be operable with pointer? David MacDonald (Monday, 4 July)
        • RE: Should we require all functionality to be operable with pointer? Jonathan Avila (Monday, 4 July)
          • Re: Should we require all functionality to be operable with pointer? Gregg Vanderheiden (Monday, 4 July)
          • Re: Should we require all functionality to be operable with pointer? Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 4 July)
            • Re: Should we require all functionality to be operable with pointer? Gregg Vanderheiden (Monday, 4 July)
      • Re: Should we require all functionality to be operable with pointer? Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 4 July)
        • Re: Should we require all functionality to be operable with pointer? Gregg Vanderheiden RTF (Monday, 4 July)
  • Re: Should we require all functionality to be operable with pointer? Patrick H. Lauke (Tuesday, 5 July)

Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content David MacDonald (Monday, 4 July)

• Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Steve Faulkner (Monday, 4 July)
  • Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content David MacDonald (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content David MacDonald (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content David MacDonald (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content David MacDonald (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Gregg Vanderheiden (Monday, 4 July)
• RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Jonathan Avila (Monday, 4 July)
  • Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Laura Carlson (Tuesday, 5 July)
    • Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Alastair Campbell (Wednesday, 6 July)
      • 1100% may be physically impossible and still not achieve the results on smaller monitors ALAN SMITH (Wednesday, 6 July)
        • Re: 1100% may be physically impossible and still not achieve the results on smaller monitors Laura Carlson (Wednesday, 6 July)
        • Re: 1100% may be physically impossible and still not achieve the results on smaller monitors David MacDonald (Wednesday, 6 July)
        • RE: 1100% may be physically impossible and still not achieve the results on smaller monitors ALAN SMITH (Wednesday, 6 July)
        • Re: 1100% may be physically impossible and still not achieve the results on smaller monitors Gregg Vanderheiden (Wednesday, 6 July)
          • Re: 1100% may be physically impossible and still not achieve the results on smaller monitors Léonie Watson (Wednesday, 6 July)
            • Re: 1100% may be physically impossible and still not achieve the results on smaller monitors Alastair Campbell (Thursday, 7 July)
          • Re: 1100% may be physically impossible and still not achieve the results on smaller monitors David MacDonald (Wednesday, 6 July)
          • RE: 1100% may be physically impossible and still not achieve the results on smaller monitors Jonathan Avila (Monday, 11 July)
            • Re: 1100% may be physically impossible and still not achieve the results on smaller monitors Gregg Vanderheiden (Monday, 11 July)
        • Re: 1100% may be physically impossible and still not achieve the results on smaller monitors Patrick H. Lauke (Tuesday, 12 July)
          • Re: 1100% may be physically impossible and still not achieve the results on smaller monitors Alastair Campbell (Tuesday, 12 July)
• RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Jonathan Avila (Monday, 4 July)
• RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Jonathan Avila (Monday, 4 July)
  • Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Gregg Vanderheiden (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content David MacDonald (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content David MacDonald (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content David MacDonald (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Gregg Vanderheiden (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Gregg Vanderheiden RTF (Monday, 4 July)
  • Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content David MacDonald (Monday, 4 July)
• RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Jonathan Avila (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Gregg Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 5 July)
  • Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Alastair Campbell (Tuesday, 5 July)
    • Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Gregg Vanderheiden RTF (Tuesday, 5 July)
      • Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Alastair Campbell (Wednesday, 6 July)
        • Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content David MacDonald (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Alastair Campbell (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Alastair Campbell (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Gregg Vanderheiden (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Alastair Campbell (Friday, 8 July)
  • Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 8 July)
    • Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Alastair Campbell (Friday, 8 July)
      • Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Detlev Fischer (Friday, 8 July)

Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Patrick H. Lauke (Sunday, 3 July)

• Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT David MacDonald (Monday, 4 July)
  • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Gregg Vanderheiden (Monday, 4 July)
  • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 4 July)
    • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Gregg Vanderheiden RTF (Monday, 4 July)
      • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 4 July)
        • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Gregg Vanderheiden RTF (Monday, 4 July)
          • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 4 July)
            • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 4 July)
            • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Gregg Vanderheiden RTF (Monday, 4 July)
            • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 4 July)
            • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Gregg Vanderheiden RTF (Tuesday, 5 July)
        • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT David MacDonald (Monday, 4 July)
• RE: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Jonathan Avila (Monday, 4 July)
  • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Gregg Vanderheiden (Monday, 4 July)
    • RE: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Jonathan Avila (Monday, 4 July)
    • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 4 July)
  • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Alastair Campbell (Friday, 8 July)
  • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 8 July)
    • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Alastair Campbell (Friday, 8 July)
      • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT David MacDonald (Friday, 8 July)
        • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Detlev Fischer (Friday, 8 July)
          • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 11 July)
            • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Jonathan Avila (Monday, 11 July)
            • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 11 July)
            • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Gregg Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 12 July)
            • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Alastair Campbell (Tuesday, 12 July)
            • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Patrick H. Lauke (Tuesday, 12 July)
            • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Gregg Vanderheiden RTF (Wednesday, 13 July)
            • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT David MacDonald (Thursday, 14 July)
            • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Patrick H. Lauke (Thursday, 14 July)
            • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT David MacDonald (Thursday, 14 July)
• Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 15 July)
  • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT David MacDonald (Friday, 15 July)
• Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT David MacDonald (Friday, 15 July)
• Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 15 July)
  • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Detlev Fischer (Friday, 15 July)
    • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 15 July)
      • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Detlev Fischer (Friday, 15 July)
        • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 15 July)
        • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT David MacDonald (Friday, 15 July)
          • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Alastair Campbell (Friday, 15 July)
            • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 15 July)
            • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT David MacDonald (Friday, 15 July)
            • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Alastair Campbell (Monday, 18 July)
            • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 18 July)
  • Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT David MacDonald (Friday, 15 July)
• Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 15 July)

Re: Quick (hopefully) question about WCAG 2 glossary definition of "keyboard interface" Gregg Vanderheiden RTF (Friday, 1 July)

• Re: Quick (hopefully) question about WCAG 2 glossary definition of "keyboard interface" Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: Quick (hopefully) question about WCAG 2 glossary definition of "keyboard interface" Detlev Fischer (Friday, 1 July)
  • Re: Quick (hopefully) question about WCAG 2 glossary definition of "keyboard interface" Gregg Vanderheiden RTF (Friday, 1 July)
    • Re: Quick (hopefully) question about WCAG 2 glossary definition of "keyboard interface" Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 1 July)
      • Re: Quick (hopefully) question about WCAG 2 glossary definition of "keyboard interface" Gregg Vanderheiden RTF (Friday, 1 July)

Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald (Friday, 1 July)

• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald (Friday, 1 July)

Last message date: Thursday, 28 July 2016 19:52:27 UTC