Re: Mobile Accessibility Taskforce Agenda

Yep, the decision on the WCAG call this week was for the Task Forces to
focus on writing new SC, and then the broader Working Group would decide if
and where to combine any of them into existing SCs.

I'm sure Cathy will have more on today's MATF call.

No rage quite detected.   ┬──┬◡ﾉ(° -°ﾉ)

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
wrote:

> On 18/07/2016 15:28, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
>
>> Actually, just forget this. If somebody wants to try and take this, or a
>> similar approach, forward, that'd be great. Personally, I've had enough
>> of the discussion at this point and I'll save it for WCAG 3...
>>
>
> Btw, as it seems this caused some confusion: the "had enough" comment was
> about trying to push for a fundamental change to 2.1/2.1.1/2.1.2/2.1.3 to
> cover more than just keyboard. This wasn't a "I'm rage-quitting the TF"
> moment.
>
> As I see that WCAG WG itself has decided that any SCs currently in 2.0 are
> off-limits for drastic changes for 2.1 (and that if needed, the
> chair/editors themselves will look at unifying/combining things) [see point
> 2 of Andrew's email
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2016JulSep/0325.html], my
> proposal is dead in the water anyway...
>
> ...however, having spoken  with some of the TF members offline, there may
> be a good/sensible follow-up plan for how we tackle the whole
> keyboard/touch/mouse/with AT/without AT/pressure/tilt/etc hairball.
>
>
> P
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
>
> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>
>