- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 15:27:27 +0100
- To: "public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
On 04/07/2016 15:22, Alastair Campbell wrote: > Secondly, if the user is in a mobile context (e.g. screenreader on a > smartphone) then they will be in the small screen version regardless of > zoom and require access to the same content & functionality. Therefore > all sizes of a responsive design must have equivalent content & > functionality. But Adam's point (which I also agree with in this context) is that looking purely at the "all users that are on a mobile device", they all get the equivalent experience, regardless of their ability/disability. So saying that a priori a reduced functionality small screen site is discriminating against users with disabilities on a mobile site isn't quite accurate. But, as already pointed out, since the small screen version can also be triggered in the desktop+zoom+small browser window scenario, THAT is a concern. P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Monday, 4 July 2016 14:27:48 UTC