- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 09:18:38 +0100
- Cc: "public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>, GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
On 12/07/2016 08:04, Wayne Dick wrote: [...] > I'm not saying everyone needs extreme text resize. But many with severe > low vision need it for a self paced medium. Extreme large print fills > that need. The main question, to me, is: what are you proposing? Is this something that web content authors need to cater for - provide a mechanism to enlarge text, making sure it wraps, up to 1100%? Is it a requirement for user agents - to go beyond their current zoom limit of around 500%, and to offer (like old Opera Mobile/Mini, and outliers like Dolphin on mobile) a means to enlarge text size and force rewrapping of text? I don't think anybody is disputing that having that large print will be beneficial for certain users...the question is who this requirement is aimed at and what you're asking them to do in order to allow for it/achieve it. P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Tuesday, 12 July 2016 08:19:05 UTC